Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31804183›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2019

Age Assessment of Youth and Young Adults Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Knee: A Deep Learning Approach.

Ana Luiza Dallora, Johan Sanmartin Berglund, Martin Brogren, Ola Kvist, Sandra Diaz Ruiz, André Dübbel, Peter Anderberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
40.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Luiza DalloraDepartment of Health, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6752-017X
Johan Sanmartin BerglundDepartment of Health, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4312-2246
Martin BrogrenOptriva AB, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7481-0781
Ola KvistDepartment of Pediatric Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8730-5901
Sandra Diaz RuizDepartment of Pediatric Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2016-4195
André DübbelOptriva AB, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6054-9092
Peter AnderbergDepartment of Health, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9870-8477
Blekinge Institute of Technology · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBone age assessment (BAA) is an important tool for diagnosis and in determining the time of treatment in a number of pediatric clinical scenarios, as well as in legal settings where it is used to estimate the chronological age of an individual where valid documents are lacking. Traditional methods for BAA suffer from drawbacks, such as exposing juveniles to radiation, intra- and interrater variability, and the time spent on the assessment. The employment of automated methods such as deep learning and the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can address these drawbacks and improve the assessment of age.

objectiveThe aim of this paper is to propose an automated approach for age assessment of youth and young adults in the age range when the length growth ceases and growth zones are closed (14-21 years of age) by employing deep learning using MRI of the knee.

methodsThis study carried out MRI examinations of the knee of 402 volunteer subjects-221 males (55.0%) and 181 (45.0%) females-aged 14-21 years. The method comprised two convolutional neural network (CNN) models: the first one selected the most informative images of an MRI sequence, concerning age-assessment purposes; these were then used in the second module, which was responsible for the age estimation. Different CNN architectures were tested, both training from scratch and employing transfer learning.

resultsThe CNN architecture that provided the best results was GoogLeNet pretrained on the ImageNet database. The proposed method was able to assess the age of male subjects in the range of 14-20.5 years, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.793 years, and of female subjects in the range of 14-19.5 years, with an MAE of 0.988 years. Regarding the classification of minors-with the threshold of 18 years of age-an accuracy of 98.1% for male subjects and 95.0% for female subjects was achieved.

conclusionsThe proposed method was able to assess the age of youth and young adults from 14 to 20.5 years of age for male subjects and 14 to 19.5 years of age for female subjects in a fully automated manner, without the use of ionizing radiation, addressing the drawbacks of traditional methods.

Indexed as

age assessmentbone ageconvolutional neural networksdeep learningkneemachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingmedical imagingskeletal maturitytransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID31804183
PMCPMC6923761
OpenAlexW2994569435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.