Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31804113›Full record

ArticlePsychology and aging2019

Age, cohort, and period effects on metamemory beliefs.

Christopher Hertzog, Brent J Small, G Peggy McFall, Roger A Dixon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology and aging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Interpersonal Context of Memory Complaints.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2021
    Article
  8. In multiple facets of subjective memory decline sex moderates memory predictions.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher HertzogSchool of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Brent J SmallSchool of Aging Studies, University of South Florida.
G Peggy McFallDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta.
Roger A DixonDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta.
Georgia Institute of Technology · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

Longitudinal Study of Cognitive AgingR37AG008235 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA · PI DIXON, ROGER A · 2002 to 2011
$2.4M
LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF COGNITIVE AGINGR01AG008235 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA · PI DIXON, ROGER A · 1989 to 2017
$2.3M
National Institutes of Health; National Institute on AgingNIA NIH HHS R01 AG008235NIA NIH HHS R37 AG008235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Questionnaires like the Metamemory in Adulthood Questionnaire (MIA; Dixon, Hultsch, & Hertzog, 1988) have been used to examine longitudinal changes and cross-sectional age differences in multiple metamemory facets (e.g., memory self-efficacy). This study used 3 independent cross-sectional samples (

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAgingCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMetacognitionMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID31804113
PMCPMC6901096
OpenAlexW2994599397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.