Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31804072›Full record

Trial reportChemical research in toxicology2020

Investigating E-Cigarette Particle Emissions and Human Airway Depositions under Various E-Cigarette-Use Conditions.

Yeongkwon Son, Gediminas Mainelis, Cristine Delnevo, Olivia A Wackowski, Stephan Schwander, Qingyu Meng

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Chemical research in toxicology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The triple-hit hypothesis: exploring pulmonary e-cigarette, PMEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. The respiratory epithelium in the era of vaping: insights fromEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Understanding the influence of atomizing power on electronic cigarette aerosol size and inhalation dose estimation.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yeongkwon SonDivision of Atmospheric Sciences , Desert Research Institute , Reno , Nevada 89512 , United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4773-6838
Gediminas MainelisORCID 0000-0002-5837-0413
Cristine Delnevo
Olivia A Wackowski
Stephan SchwanderDepartment of Urban-Global Public Health, School of Public Health , Rutgers University , Newark , New Jersey 07102 , United States.
Qingyu Meng

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES005022 · NIEHS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI Emily S Barrett · 1988 to 2026
$47.4M
Developing and testing warning statements about e-cigarettesK01CA189301 · NCI · RBHS-SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI WACKOWSKI, OLIVIA · 2014 to 2016
$478k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA189301NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

E-cigarette use is dramatically increasing, particularly with adolescents. While the chemical composition of e-liquids and e-vapor is well characterized, the particle size distribution and the human airways deposition patterns of e-cigarette particles are understudied and poorly understood despite their likely contribution to adverse health effects from e-cigarette usage. In this study, we examined the impacts of e-cigarette device power, e-liquid composition, and vaping topography on e-cigarette particle sizes and their deposition in human airways. In addition, we observed that particle measurement conditions (dilution ratio, temperature, and humidity) significantly affect measured e-cigarette particle sizes. E-cigarette power output significantly increased particle count median diameters (CMD) from 174 ± 13 (particles generated under 6.4 W) to 236 ± 14 nm (particles generated under 31.1 W). E-cigarette particles generated from propylene glycol-based e-liquids (CMD = 145 ± 8 nm and mass median diameter [MMD] = 3.06 ± 0.17 μm) were smaller than those generated from vegetable glycerin-based e-liquids (CMD = 182 ± 9 nm and MMD = 3.37 ± 0.21 μm). Puff volume also impacted vapor particle size: CMD and MMD were 154 ± 11 nm and 3.50 ± 0.27 μm, 163 ± 6 nm and 3.35 ± 0.24 μm, and 146 ± 12 nm and 2.95 ± 0.14 μm, respectively, for 35, 90, and 170 mL puffs. Estimated e-cigarette particle mass deposition fractions in tracheobronchial and bronchoalveolar regions were 0.504-0.541 and 0.073-0.306, respectively. Interestingly, e-cigarette particles are smaller than the particles generated from cigarette smoking but have similar human airway deposition patterns.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsAdolescentAdultAerosolsAgedFemaleHumansHumidityMaleMiddle AgedParticle SizeRespiratory SystemTemperatureYoung AdultAerosols

Identifiers

PMID31804072
PMCPMC7301609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.