Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31803850›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2019

Improving the use of intravenous antihypertensive medications in the hospital setting: a quality improvement initiative for patient safety.

Jacob Salman, Alicja Salman, Sarwan Kumar, Rudin Gjeka, Vesna Tegeltija, Daymon Peterson, Nour Chams, Ian Ross

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jacob Salman *Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan, USA.
Alicja Salman *Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan, USA.
Sarwan KumarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan, USA.
Rudin GjekaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan, USA.
Vesna TegeltijaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan, USA.
Daymon PetersonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan, USA.
Nour ChamsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan, USA.
Ian RossPharmacy Department, Crittenton Hospital Medical Center, Rochester, Michigan, USA.
Wayne State University · USCrittenton Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravenous (IV) hydralazine, enalapril and labetalol are oftentimes used without indication for the treatment of asymptomatic hypertension in the hospital setting and have been shown to have substantial adverse effects that are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, as well as longer length of stay. Their use is also associated with greater monetary costs. In this project, we studied the frequency of use and consequences of these medications before and after a series of education cycles which clarified when and when not to use intravenous antihypertensives (IVAHs). Our initial aim was to decrease the unindicated use of IVAH by at least 25% in the setting of asymptomatic hypertension in our community hospital within a 1-year period after introducing education on the topic. Multidisciplinary involvement throughout three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles yielded favourable results. We focused on education towards a hospital-wide knowledge gap stemming from a lack of guidelines regarding the treatment of asymptomatic hypertension, as well as the guideline indications for IVAH. After three cycles of education targeting different groups, the unindicated use of IVAH fell by a total of 66%, decreasing patient exposure by approximately 248 cases over the total course of the study and ultimately, yielding a 52% increase in patient safety. Secondary outcome included a reduction in cost. It was noted that IV drugs cost more than their oral counterparts. The culture change in switching away from IVAH unless otherwise indicated was driven by repetitive education and group discussion to close the gap created by a lack of guidelines.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAntihypertensive AgentsPatient SafetyQuality ImprovementEnalaprilFemaleHealth PersonnelHospitalsHumansHydralazineHypertensionLabetalolRetrospective StudiesAntihypertensive AgentsEnalaprilHydralazineLabetalolhealthcare quality improvementmedical educationmedication reconciliationmedication safetypatient safety

Identifiers

PMID31803850
PMCPMC6887509
OpenAlexW2989840553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.