Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31803819›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2019

Bariatric endoscopy procedure type or follow-up: What predicted success at 1 year in 962 obese patients?

Gontrand Lopez-Nava, Ravishankar Asokkumar, Angel Rull, Fernandez Corbelle, Lucia Beltran, Inmaculada Bautista

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. How to establish an endoscopic bariatric practice.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gontrand Lopez-NavaBariatric Endoscopy Unit, HM Sanchinarro University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Ravishankar AsokkumarBariatric Endoscopy Unit, HM Sanchinarro University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Angel RullBariatric Endoscopy Unit, HM Sanchinarro University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Fernandez CorbelleBariatric Endoscopy Unit, HM Sanchinarro University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Lucia BeltranBariatric Endoscopy Unit, HM Sanchinarro University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Inmaculada BautistaBariatric Endoscopy Unit, HM Sanchinarro University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID31803819
PMCPMC6887647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.