ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2019
An Epidemiological and Economic Simulation Model to Evaluate Strategies for the Control of Bovine Virus Diarrhea in Germany.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- GFP-Tagged EViruses · 2026Article
- Seroprevalence and Molecular Detection of Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus in Selected Dairy Farms in Southwest Ethiopia.Veterinary medicine international · 2026Article
- Economics of vaccination against diarrhoea and respiratory diseases in French cow calves' systems: A modelling approach.PloS one · 2025Article
- Serosurvey and Associated Risk Factors for Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus Infection in Dromedary Camels in Egypt.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2024Article
- Review state-of-the-art of output-based methodological approaches for substantiating freedom from infection.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Review
- Structure of Bovine CD46 Ectodomain.Viruses · 2023Article
- The combination of vaccines and adjuvants to prevent the occurrence of high incidence of infectious diseases in bovine.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Review
- Learning and strategic imitation in modelling farmers' dynamic decisions on bovine viral diarrhoea vaccination.Veterinary research · 2022Article
- A Metapopulation Model for Preventing the Reintroduction of Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus to Naïve Herds: Scotland Case Study.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Article
- Eradication of Bovine Viral Diarrhoea (BVD) in Cattle in Switzerland: Lessons Taught by the Complex Biology of the Virus.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Review
- Overview of Slovenian Control Programmes for Cattle Diseases Not Regulated by the European Union.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Review
- The Northern Ireland Control Programmes for Infectious Cattle Diseases Not Regulated by the EU.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
- The Principles of the Voluntary Programme for the Control and Elimination of Bovine Viral Diarrhoea Virus (BVDV) From Infected Herds in Slovenia.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
- A Practical Introduction to Mechanistic Modeling of Disease Transmission in Veterinary Science.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Models can be used to plan, evaluate, and improve programs for animal disease control. In Germany, a nationwide compulsory program to eradicate Bovine viral diarrhea (BVD) is in force since January 2011. As it is associated with substantial expenditures, the program is currently under revision. To provide the basis for a science-based decision on the future course of BVD control in Germany, we evaluated 13 scenarios (sc1-13) with respect to the chance of reaching freedom from disease and their economic implications for a period of 20 years (2011-2030). To simulate the impact of different control strategies on disease dynamics, a disease spread model was developed. To estimate the effects of a transient infection (TI) on animal level, a gross margin analysis was performed. To assess the value of cattle that died prematurely, a valuation model was used. Finally, an economic model was developed to perform a cost-benefit analysis and to compare each control scenario with a baseline setting with no BVD control. Costs comprised the expenditures for diagnostics, vaccination, preventive culling, and trade restrictions. Benefits were animal and production losses avoided by having control measures in place. The results show that reducing the PI prevalence on animal level to 0% is only feasible in scenarios that combine antigen or antibody testing with compulsory vaccination. All other scenarios, i.e., those based exclusively on a "test and cull" approach, including the current control program, will, according to the model, not achieve freedom of BVD by 2030. On the other hand, none of the scenarios that may lead to complete BVD eradication is economically attractive [benefit-cost ratio (BCR) between 0.64 and 0.94]. The average direct costs of BVD in Germany are estimated at 113 million Euros per year (34-402 million Euros), corresponding to 28.3 million Euros per million animals. Only the concepts of the former and the current national BVD control program ("ear tag testing and culling") may reduce the BVD prevalence to 0.01% with an acceptable BCR (net present value of 222 and 238 million Euros, respectively, with a BCR of 1.22 and 1.24).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.