Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31803749›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2019

Glycine Protects Muscle Cells From Wasting

Marissa K Caldow, Daniel J Ham, Jennifer Trieu, Jin Dylan Chung, Gordon S Lynch, René Koopman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marissa K CaldowCentre for Muscle Research, Department of Physiology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Daniel J HamCentre for Muscle Research, Department of Physiology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jennifer TrieuCentre for Muscle Research, Department of Physiology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jin Dylan ChungCentre for Muscle Research, Department of Physiology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Gordon S LynchCentre for Muscle Research, Department of Physiology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
René KoopmanCentre for Muscle Research, Department of Physiology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glycine supplementation can protect skeletal muscles of mice from cancer-induced wasting, but the mechanisms underlying this protection are not well-understood. The aim of this study was to determine whether exogenous glycine directly protects skeletal muscle cells from wasting. C2C12 muscle cells were exposed to non-inflammatory catabolic stimuli via two models: serum withdrawal (SF) for 48 h; or incubation in HEPES buffered saline (HBS) for up to 5 h. Cells were supplemented with glycine or equimolar concentrations of L-alanine. SF- and HBS-treated myotubes (with or without L-alanine) were ~20% and ~30% smaller than control myotubes. Glycine-treated myotubes were up to 20% larger (

Indexed as

amino acidsatrophyC2C12muscle wastingprotein synthesisstarvation

Identifiers

PMID31803749
PMCPMC6871541
OpenAlexW2984841306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.