Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31803620›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2019

Identification of Subtype-Specific Three-Gene Signature for Prognostic Prediction in Diffuse Type Gastric Cancer.

Bowen Bao, Chunlei Zheng, Bowen Yang, Yue Jin, Kezuo Hou, Zhi Li, Xueying Zheng, Shitong Yu, Xiaojie Zhang, Yibo Fan and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bowen BaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Chunlei ZhengDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Bowen YangDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yue JinDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Kezuo HouDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Zhi LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Xueying ZhengDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Shitong YuDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Xiaojie ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yibo FanDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Xiujuan QuDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yunpeng LiuDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Xiaofang CheDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
First Hospital of China Medical University · CNChina Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC), with high heterogeneity, can be mainly classified into intestinal type and diffuse type according to the Lauren classification system. Although a number of differences were reported between these two types, no study on the Lauren subtype-specific multi-gene signature for evaluation of GC prognosis has been conducted, and the molecular mechanism underlying its poor prognosis has still remained elusive. Therefore, this study aimed to explore subtype-specific multi-gene signature for prognostic prediction in different subtypes of Lauren classification. With combination of the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm and the Akaike information criterion (AIC), the 3-gene subtype-specific prognostic signature was successfully established in diffuse type GC using GSE62254 dataset. Following the calculation of risk score (RS) based on 3-gene signature, the nomogram models were established to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival in diffuse type GC. Moreover, the prognostic predictive nomogram model of diffuse type GC was also proved to be effective for validation of GSE1549 dataset and by a Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO)-based meta-analysis. In the analysis of the correlation between RS and clinical-pathological characteristics, RS and two genes of the 3-gene signature (EMCN and COL4A5) were found to be positively correlated with peritoneal metastasis. Furthermore, EMCN and COL4A5, rather than CCL11, were proved to be able to enhance the adhesion ability of MKN45 and NUGC4 cells to peritoneal mesothelial cell line HMR-SV5. Eventually, it was proved that COL4A5 promoted peritoneal metastasis by activating Wnt signaling pathway, whereas the upregulation of integrin family genes mediated by FAK-AKT/ERK/STAT3 signaling pathway activation is involved in peritoneal metastasis promotion function of EMCN. Taken together, our study identified the subtype-specific 3-gene signature in diffuse type GC, which could effectively predict the patients' OS and might explain the molecular mechanisms in presence of its poor prognosis.

Indexed as

diffuse typegastric cancernomogramperitoneal metastasissignature

Identifiers

PMID31803620
PMCPMC6869510
OpenAlexW2984626877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.