Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31803512›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2019

The care and transport of trauma victims by layperson emergency medical systems: a qualitative study in Delhi, India.

Kavi Bhalla, Veena Sriram, Radhika Arora, Richa Ahuja, Mathew Varghese, Girish Agrawal, Geetam Tiwari, Dinesh Mohan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Training and certification in first responder care among mountaineering practitioners in east Africa.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prehospital Care for Road Traffic Injury Victims.Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kavi BhallaPublic Health Sciences, University of Chicago Biological Sciences Division, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6679-7820
Veena SriramCenter for Health and the Social Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7235-253X
Radhika AroraIndependent Researcher, Delhi, India.
Richa AhujaIndian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Mathew VargheseSt. Stephen's Hospital, Delhi, India.
Girish AgrawalOP Jindal Global University, Sonipat, Haryana, India.
Geetam TiwariIndian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Dinesh MohanIndian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India.

Funding

Establishing feasibility of a taxi based dispatcher coordinated layperson emergency medical system for use in low and middle income countriesR21TW010168 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BAWA BHALLA, KANWALJEET SINGH · 2016 to 2017
$383k
FIC NIH HHS R21 TW010168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAmbulance-based emergency medical systems (EMS) are expensive and remain rare in low- and middle-income countries, where trauma victims are usually transported to hospital by passing vehicles. Recent developments in transportation network technologies could potentially disrupt this status quo by allowing coordinated emergency response from layperson networks. We sought to understand the barriers to bystander assistance for trauma victims in Delhi, India, and implications for a layperson-EMS.

methodsWe used qualitative methods to analyse data from 50 interviews with frontline stakeholders (including taxi drivers, medical professionals, legal experts and police), one stakeholder consultation and a review of documents.

resultsRespondents noted that most trauma victims in Delhi are rapidly brought to hospital by bystanders, taxis and police. While ambulances are common, they are primarily used for interfacility transfers. Entrenched medico-legal practices result in substantial police presence at the hospital, which is a major source of harassment of good Samaritans and interferes with patient care. Trauma victims are often turned away by for-profit hospitals due to their inability to pay, leading to delays in treatment. Recent policy efforts to circumscribe the role of police and force for-profit hospitals to stabilise patients appear to have been unsuccessful.

conclusionsExisting healthcare and medico-legal practices in India create large systemic impediments to improving trauma outcomes. Until India's ongoing health and transport sector reforms succeed in ensuring that for-profit hospitals reliably provide care, good Samaritans and layperson-EMS providers should take victims with uncertain financial means to public facilities. To avoid difficulties with police, providers of a layperson-EMS would likely need official police sanction and carry visible symbols of their authority to provide emergency transport. Delhi already has several key components of an EMS (including dispatcher coordinated police response, large ambulance fleet) that could be integrated and expanded into a complete system of emergency care.

Indexed as

health systemsinjuryqualitative studytraumatology

Identifiers

PMID31803512
PMCPMC6882548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.