ArticleDental research journal
Article in Dental research journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Zirconia Crowns for Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Clinical and radiographic performance of preformed zirconia crowns and stainless-steel crowns in permanent first molars: 18-month results of a prospective, randomized trial.BMC oral health · 2023Trial
- Marginal Fit, Internal Adaptation, and Microleakage of Preformed Metal Crowns: Impact of Three Preparation Techniques and Three Ion-Releasing Cements.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The internal fit and fracture resistance of stainless-steel crowns and porcelain fused to metal crowns in intact and severely damaged permanent molars: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Novel 3D printed resin crown versus prefabricated zirconia crown for restoring pulpotomized primary molars: in vitro evaluation of fracture resistance and marginal gap.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025Article
- Retention of Bioflx, Zirconia, and Stainless Steel crowns using two different luting cements in primary molars: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Marginal and internal adaptation and absolute marginal discrepancy of 3D-printed, milled, and prefabricated crowns for primary molar teeth: an in vitro comparative study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Retention of Pediatric BioFlx Crowns Versus Stainless Steel Crowns Using Different Types of Luting Cements: An In Vitro Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Literature Review of Stainless Steel Crown for Permanent Molars: Indications, Survival, Periodontal and Radiographic Findings.Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) · 2025Review
- The fracture resistance of pulpotomized primary molars restored with zirconia crowns, lithium disilicate or resin based ceramic endocrowns.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- SEM Evaluation of the Marginal Gap of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Full Crowns and the Effect of Post Crystallization: An In Vitro Study.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- A Machine Learning Approach for Modelling Cold-Rolling Curves for Various Stainless Steels.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Bond strength and microleakage of different types of cements in stainless steel crown of primary molar teeth.Dental research journal · 2021Article
- In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Different Luting Cements and Tooth Preparation Angle on the Microleakage of Zirconia Crowns.International journal of dentistry · 2021Article
- Use of Restorative Full Crowns Made with Zirconia in Children: A Systematic Review.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study was to assess and compare the marginal and internal fit of stainless steel crowns (SSCs) with those of preveneered SSCs and zirconia crowns using different luting cements. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this
resultsZirconia crowns, especially those cemented with resin cement, were associated with the lowest marginal and internal gap width. Regardless of the luting cement, no significant difference was observed between all three crowns tested in terms of marginal gap (
conclusionZirconia crowns cemented with resin cement were the most accurately fitted internally, while marginally, they were not significantly different from the rest of crown-luting cement combinations tested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31803381PMC6873236What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.