Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31803348›Full record

ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging2019

FULLY-AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION OF KIDNEYS IN CLINICAL ULTRASOUND IMAGES USING A BOUNDARY DISTANCE REGRESSION NETWORK.

Shi Yin, Zhengqiang Zhang, Hongming Li, Qinmu Peng, Xinge You, Susan L Furth, Gregory E Tasian, Yong Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Multi-instance Deep Learning with Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Diagnosis of Kidney Diseases Using Ultrasound Imaging.Uncertainty for safe utilization of machine learning in medical imaging and clinical image-based procedures : first International Workshop, UNSURE 2019, and 8th International Workshop, CLIP 2019, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2019, Sh... · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shi YinSchool of Electronic Information and Communications, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zhengqiang ZhangSchool of Electronic Information and Communications, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Hongming LiDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Qinmu PengSchool of Electronic Information and Communications, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xinge YouSchool of Electronic Information and Communications, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Susan L FurthDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Gregory E TasianDepartment of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Urology, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Yong FanDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Funding

Phenotypic Diversity in COVID-19UL1TR001878 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FITZGERALD, GARRET A · 2016 to 2025
$102.4M
Research Project Core 2P50DK114786 · NIDDK · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI Razzaghi Hanieh · 2017 to 2026
$9.6M
Biomedical Image Computing and Informatics ClusterS10OD023495 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS · 2017 to 2017
$1.9M
Anatomic biomarkers of chronic kidney disease progression among childrenR21DK117297 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FAN, YONG, TASIAN, GREGORY EDWARD · 2019 to 2020
$469k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001878NIDDK NIH HHS P50 DK114786NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK117297NIH HHS S10 OD023495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It remains challenging to automatically segment kidneys in clinical ultrasound images due to the kidneys' varied shapes and image intensity distributions, although semi-automatic methods have achieved promising performance. In this study, we developed a novel boundary distance regression deep neural network to segment the kidneys, informed by the fact that the kidney boundaries are relatively consistent across images in terms of their appearance. Particularly, we first use deep neural networks pre-trained for classification of natural images to extract high-level image features from ultrasound images, then these feature maps are used as input to learn kidney boundary distance maps using a boundary distance regression network, and finally the predicted boundary distance maps are classified as kidney pixels or non-kidney pixels using a pixel classification network in an end-to-end learning fashion. Experimental results have demonstrated that our method could effectively improve the performance of automatic kidney segmentation, significantly better than deep learning based pixel classification networks.

Indexed as

boundary detectiondeep learningfully-automatic segmentationUltrasound imaging

Identifiers

PMID31803348
PMCPMC6892163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.