Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31803266›Full record

ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2019

COPD treatment choices based on blood eosinophils: are we there yet?

Brian Oliver, Katrina Tonga, David Darley, Sandra Rutting, Xin Zhang, Hui Chen, Gang Wang

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Eosinophil count and treatment response in COPD patients.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biomarkers in respiratory diseases.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Brian OliverSchool of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7122-9262
Katrina TongaThe Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8594-366X
David DarleyDept of Thoracic and Transplant Medicine and St Vincent's Clinical School, St Vincent's Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9721-101X
Sandra RuttingThe Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Xin ZhangDept of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Research Centre for Respiratory Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hui ChenSchool of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Gang WangDept of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Research Centre for Respiratory Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5048-6606
Sichuan University · CNThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eosinophils are increasingly being recognised as an important characteristic feature of COPD. Patients with COPD and eosinophilic inflammation tend to respond to steroid therapy; however, many questions remain regarding the optimum measurement. Eosinophilic inflammation may be defined based on various sampling techniques, including eosinophil levels in blood, sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage or biopsy, which leads to inconsistencies in its definition. Blood eosinophils may increase in conjunction with sputum eosinophils during COPD exacerbations and therefore may be a good surrogate marker of airway eosinophilic inflammation. However, the timing of the blood eosinophil measurement, the stability of the eosinophil count and the threshold used in different studies are variable. The use of blood eosinophil count to direct biological therapies in COPD has also had variable outcomes. Eosinophilic inflammation has an important role in COPD management; however, its use as the optimum biomarker still needs further investigation. KEY POINTS: Eosinophilia may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of COPD.Eosinophilic inflammation in COPD can be steroid responsive; however, eosinophilic inflammation is variable, and caution needs to be taken with measurements and the thresholds used.The long-term effects of reducing eosinophil levels in COPD is unclear. EDUCATIONAL

aimsTo explore current knowledge of eosinophils in COPD.To explore the relationship between eosinophilia and corticosteroid use.To understand the limitations of assessing and using eosinophilia in COPD.

Identifiers

PMID31803266
PMCPMC6885347
OpenAlexW2994289229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.