ArticleFrontiers in plant science2019
Boosting Genetic Gain in Allogamous Crops
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced disease resistance in chickpea and canola via MAGPIE: Major-Effect Allele and Genomic Polygenic Integration for Enhancement.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Integrative transcriptional regulatory networks governing cereal root responses to heavy metals and drought.Plant cell reports · 2026Review
- Review
- Speed breeding enhances crop resilience and productivity in a changing climate.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2025Review
- Maximizing the accuracy of genetic variance estimation and using a novel generalized effective sample size to improve simulations.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Article
- Flowering Synchronization Using Artificial Light Control for Crossbreeding Hemp (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Impact of High-Temperature Stress on Maize Seed Setting: Cellular and Molecular Insights of Thermotolerance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Evaluating genomic selection and speed breeding for Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat using stochastic simulations.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2025Article
- Biotechnological studies towards improvement of finger millet using multi-omics approaches.Functional & integrative genomics · 2024Review
- Evaluation of deep learning for predicting rice traits using structural and single-nucleotide genomic variants.Plant methods · 2024Article
- Q&A: Methods for estimating genetic gain in sub-Saharan Africa and achieving improved gains.The plant genome · 2024Article
- Genetic gains in IRRI's rice salinity breeding and elite panel development as a future breeding resource.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024Article
- Genome-wide association study and genomic selection of flax powdery mildew in Xinjiang Province.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Mate selection: A useful approach to maximize genetic gain and control inbreeding in genomic and conventional oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) hybrid breeding.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Integrated Genomic Selection for Accelerating Breeding Programs of Climate-Smart Cereals.Genes · 2023Review
- Transposable element polymorphisms improve prediction of complex agronomic traits in rice.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022Article
- Integrated Approach in Genomic Selection to Accelerate Genetic Gain in Sugarcane.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Strategies of preserving genetic diversity while maximizing genetic response from implementing genomic selection in pulse breeding programs.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022Article
- Effect of clonal testing on the efficiency of genomic evaluation in forest tree breeding.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Cytokinin and Its Key Role to Enrich the Plant Nutrients and Growth Under Adverse Conditions-An Update.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breeding schemes that utilize modern breeding methods like genomic selection (GS) and speed breeding (SB) have the potential to accelerate genetic gain for different crops. We investigated through stochastic computer simulation the advantages and disadvantages of adopting both GS and SB (SpeedGS) into commercial breeding programs for allogamous crops. In addition, we studied the effect of omitting one or two selection stages from the conventional phenotypic scheme on GS accuracy, genetic gain, and inbreeding. As an example, we simulated GS and SB for five traits (heading date, forage yield, seed yield, persistency, and quality) with different genetic architectures and heritabilities (0.7, 0.3, 0.4, 0.1, and 0.3; respectively) for a tall fescue breeding program. We developed a new method to simulate correlated traits with complex architectures of which effects can be sampled from multiple distributions, e.g. to simulate the presence of both minor and major genes. The phenotypic selection scheme required 11 years, while the proposed SpeedGS schemes required four to nine years per cycle. Generally, SpeedGS schemes resulted in higher genetic gain per year for all traits especially for traits with low heritability such as persistency. Our results showed that running more SB rounds resulted in higher genetic gain per cycle when compared to phenotypic or GS only schemes and this increase was more pronounced per year when cycle time was shortened by omitting cycle stages. While GS accuracy declined with additional SB rounds, the decline was less in round three than in round two, and it stabilized after the fourth SB round. However, more SB rounds resulted in higher inbreeding rate, which could limit long-term genetic gain. The inbreeding rate was reduced by approximately 30% when generating the initial population for each cycle through random crosses instead of generating half-sib families. Our study demonstrated a large potential for additional genetic gain from combining GS and SB. Nevertheless, methods to mitigate inbreeding should be considered for optimal utilization of these highly accelerated breeding programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.