Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31803189›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2019

Conservation Analysis of B-Cell Allergen Epitopes to Predict Clinical Cross-Reactivity Between Shellfish and Inhalant Invertebrate Allergens.

Roni Nugraha, Sandip D Kamath, Elecia Johnston, Shaymaviswanathan Karnaneedi, Thimo Ruethers, Andreas L Lopata

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Calcium-binding proteins as allergens.Frontiers in allergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Recombinant Tropomyosin from the Pacific Oyster (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Roni NugrahaAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
Sandip D KamathAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
Elecia JohnstonAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
Shaymaviswanathan KarnaneediAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
Thimo RuethersAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
Andreas L LopataAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
James Cook University · AUAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine · AUMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding and predicting an individual's clinical cross-reactivity to related allergens is a key to better management, treatment and progression of novel therapeutics for food allergy. In food allergy, clinical cross-reactivity is observed in patients reacting to unexpected allergen sources containing the same allergenic protein or antibody binding patches (epitopes), often resulting in severe allergic reactions. Shellfish allergy affects up to 2% of the world population and persists for life in most patients. The diagnosis of shellfish allergy is however often challenging due to reported clinical cross-reactivity to other invertebrates including mites and cockroaches. Prediction of cross-reactivity can be achieved utilizing an in-depth analysis of a few selected IgE-antibody binding epitopes. We combined available experimentally proven IgE-binding epitopes with informatics-based cross-reactivity prediction modeling to assist in the identification of clinical cross-reactive biomarkers on shellfish allergens. This knowledge can be translated into prevention and treatment of allergic diseases. To overcome the problem of predicting IgE cross-reactivity of shellfish allergens we developed an epitope conservation model using IgE binding epitopes available in the Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource (http://www.iedb.org/). We applied this method to a set of four different shrimp allergens, and successfully identified several non-cross-reactive as well as cross-reactive epitopes, which have been experimentally established to cross-react. Based on these findings we suggest that this method can be used for advanced component-resolved-diagnosis to identify patients sensitized to a specific shellfish group and distinguish from patients with extensive cross-reactivity to ingested and inhaled allergens from invertebrate sources.

Indexed as

InvertebratesShellfishAllergensAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsArginine KinaseArthropod ProteinsCalcium-Binding ProteinsCross ReactionsEpitopes, B-LymphocyteFood HypersensitivityHumansImmunoglobulin EMyosin Light ChainsTropomyosinAllergensArginine KinaseArthropod ProteinsCalcium-Binding ProteinsEpitopes, B-LymphocyteImmunoglobulin EMyosin Light ChainsTropomyosinB-cell epitopesIgE epitopesshellfish allergensshellfish cross-reactivitytropomyosin

Identifiers

PMID31803189
PMCPMC6877653
OpenAlexW2989732052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.