Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31803164›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2019

Review of Antibiotic Resistance, Ecology, Dissemination, and Mitigation in U.S. Broiler Poultry Systems.

Yichao Yang, Amanda J Ashworth, Cammy Willett, Kimberly Cook, Abhinav Upadhyay, Phillip R Owens, Steven C Ricke, Jennifer M DeBruyn, Philip A Moore

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. In vitro probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the intestines of Muscovy ducks.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Practical Preventive Considerations for Reducing the Public Health Burden of Poultry-Related Salmonellosis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Assessing Contact Time and Concentration ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Pilot Study on the Action ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yichao YangDepartment of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Amanda J AshworthPoultry Production and Product Safety Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Cammy WillettDepartment of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Kimberly CookBacterial Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Athens, GA, United States.
Abhinav UpadhyayDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Phillip R OwensUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Dale Bumpers Small Farms Research Center, Booneville, AR, United States.
Steven C RickeDepartment of Food Science and Center for Food Safety, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Jennifer M DeBruynDepartment of Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Philip A MoorePoultry Production and Product Safety Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Fayetteville, AR, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the onset of land application of poultry litter, transportation of microorganisms, antibiotics, and disinfectants to new locations has occurred. While some studies provide evidence that antimicrobial resistance (AMR), an evolutionary phenomenon, could be influenced by animal production systems, other research suggests AMR originates in the environment from non-anthropogenic sources. In addition, AMR impacts the effective prevention and treatment of poultry illnesses and is increasingly a threat to global public health. Therefore, there is a need to understand the dissemination of AMR genes to the environment, particularly those directly relevant to animal health using the One Health Approach. This review focuses on the potential movement of resistance genes to the soil via land application of poultry litter. Additionally, we highlight impacts of AMR on microbial ecology and explore hypotheses explaining gene movement pathways from U.S. broiler operations to the environment. Current approaches for decreasing antibiotic use in U.S. poultry operations are also described in this review.

Indexed as

antibiotic resistant gene determinantbroiler systemsenvironmental disseminationOne Health Approachsoil microbiome

Identifiers

PMID31803164
PMCPMC6872647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.