ArticleCancer management and research2019
The Diagnostic Value Of Using
Article in Cancer management and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cutting-edge approaches in pet imaging for gliomas: current applications for neurooncologists and the path to theranostic breakthroughs.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Review
- Metastatic Meningioma: Neuroradiologic and Molecular Imaging Perspectives.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the potential role of PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 124 patients met the final inclusion criterion. Tumor to gray ratio (TGR) was compared with Ki-67 labeling index, and its correlations with pre-operative neurological function and treatment status were also evaluated. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to determine a cut-off value which could discriminate meningioma of different grades. Prognostic factors including TGR were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curve and cox proportional model.
resultsThe TGR of higher World Health Organization (WHO) grade meningioma was significantly higher than that in lower grade (p < 0.001), and it was correlated with the Ki-67 labeling index (p < 0.001, r = 0.1545). The TGR of 1.30 was the best cutoff value for the detection of high grade (WHO grade II&III) meningioma from low grade (WHO grade I) according to ROC analysis, with a sensitivity of 61.5%, the specificity of 86.7%, and accuracy of 81.5%. The TGR (p < 0.001), treatment status (p = 0.035), tumor grade (p < 0.001) and Ki-67 labeling index (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated that TGR (p = 0.013) was an independent prognostic factor for PFS.
conclusionA high uptake of FDG was correlated with a more proliferative biological behavior and is a risk factor for tumor recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.