Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31802813›Full record

ReviewJournal of conservative dentistry : JCD

Reciprocating kinematics leads to lower incidences of postoperative pain than rotary kinematics after endodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.

Christine Men Martins, Victor Eduardo De Souza Batista, Amanda Caselato Andolfatto Souza, Ana Cristina Andrada, Graziela Garrido Mori, João Eduardo Gomes Filho

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christine Men MartinsDepartment of Dentistry, Dental School of Presidente Prudente, University of Western São Paulo, Presidente Prudente, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Victor Eduardo De Souza BatistaDepartment of Dentistry, Dental School of Presidente Prudente, University of Western São Paulo, Presidente Prudente, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Amanda Caselato Andolfatto SouzaDepartment of Endodontics, Aracatuba School of Dentistry, UNESP, Aracatuba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Cristina AndradaDepartment of Endodontics, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Graziela Garrido MoriDepartment of Dentistry, Dental School of Presidente Prudente, University of Western São Paulo, Presidente Prudente, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
João Eduardo Gomes FilhoDepartment of Dentistry, Dental School of Presidente Prudente, University of Western São Paulo, Presidente Prudente, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtrusion of infected debris into the periapical tissue has been cited as the major cause of postoperative pain, regardless of instrumentation technique.

aimComprehensively review two different kinematics of instrumentation (reciprocating and rotary) and association to the postoperative pain after endodontic treatment.

methodsTwo investigators performed a systematic review with meta-analysis. MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus supplied relevant data from studies published until February 2018 to answer the PICO question. Primary outcome was overall postoperative pain, and the secondary outcomes were nature of the pain (mild, moderate, and severe) at 12, 24, and 48 h.

resultsTen randomized clinical trials fulfilled eligibility criteria, and five of them were submitted in the meta-analysis. Primary outcome indicated that reciprocating system results in less postoperative pain compared to rotary system (

conclusionRotary motion had a negative impact on postoperative pain after endodontic treatment. Furthermore, after 48 h, more patients presented severe pain under rotary motion. More randomized clinical studies would be helpful.

Indexed as

Endodonticspostoperative painreciprocating systemroot canal therapyrotary system

Identifiers

PMID31802813
PMCPMC6873607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.