Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31802780›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2019

Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Breast Cancer Prognosis: A Sonographic Elastography Study.

Yue You, Yu Song, Songxiu Li, Zhenhai Ma, Huaying Bo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yue YouDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China (mainland).
Yu SongDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China (mainland).
Songxiu LiDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China (mainland).
Zhenhai MaDepartment of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China (mainland).
Huaying BoDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China (mainland).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Breast cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in women worldwide, and sonographic elastography has previously demonstrated good performance in detecting breast malignancies. However, the exact relationship between elastographic measures and clinical prognostic factors is still not well understood. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate any associations between major clinical prognostic factors and strain elastography and to validate the diagnostic value of elastography in breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 373 subjects with breast masses, of which 196 were benign and 177 were malignant, were included in the study. All subjects underwent routine ultrasound examination and strain elastography before biopsy. The elastographic measures - strain ratio (SR) for qualitative measures and Tsukuba score (TS) for quantitative measures - were obtained and compared with prognostic factors, including nuclear grade, lymph node status, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER-2). The SR demonstrated the best diagnostic performance in differentiation between malignant and benign lesions. RESULTS With the best cut-off value at 2.42, the SR achieved a sensitivity of 96.0% and specificity of 98.5%. Moreover, higher SRs and TSs were associated with breast lesions with a high nuclear grade and lymph node metastasis and with being ER-negative, PR-negative, and HER-2 negative. CONCLUSIONS Elastography is a useful imaging technique in differentiating benign breast masses from malignant ones. The strong relationship between prognostic factors and elastographic measures also demonstrated its excellent performance in predicting the prognosis of breast malignancies.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiopsyBreastBreast NeoplasmsChinaCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialElasticity Imaging TechniquesFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedPrognosisROC CurveSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID31802780
PMCPMC6913513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.