Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31802703›Full record

SynthesisThe Diabetes educator2020

Individual-, Community-, and Health System-Level Barriers to Optimal Type 2 Diabetes Care for Inner-City African Americans: An Integrative Review and Model Development.

Jennifer A Campbell, Leonard E Egede

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Diabetes educator, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Development and calibration data for the Healthcare Access Item Bank: a new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. 2022 National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer A CampbellMedical College of Wisconsin, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Center for Advancing Population Science, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0002-5878-6283
Leonard E EgedeMedical College of Wisconsin, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Center for Advancing Population Science, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0003-1546-1515
Medical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

HOME DM-BAT: Home-based Diabetes-Modified Behavioral Activation Treatment for Low Income Seniors with T2DM Diversity SupplementR01DK118038 · NIDDK · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI EGEDE, LEONARD E. · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Financial Incentives And Nurse Coaching to Enhance Diabetes Outcomes (FINANCE-DM) - Diversity SupplementR01DK120861 · NIDDK · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI EGEDE, LEONARD E. · 2019 to 2023
$3.4M
Technology Intensified Diabetes Education Study in AA with T2DM (TIDES)K24DK093699 · NIDDK · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI EGEDE, LEONARD E. · 2011 to 2020
$1.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK093699NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK118038NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK120861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this integrative review is (1) to elucidate the unique barriers faced by inner-city African Americans for type 2 diabetes (T2DM) care; (2) to identify effective interventions/programs for optimal T2DM care at the individual, community, and health systems levels; and (3) to integrate 2 behavioral models and 1 social ecological model for framing interventions for inner-city African American to optimize T2DM care.

methodsPRISMA guidelines were followed to systematically search PubMed, PsychInfo, and CINAHL. Integration of models was based on underlying principles of social ecological models.

resultsThe search returned 1183 articles. Forty-six articles were synthesized after applying inclusion criteria. Multiple barriers for the individual level, community level, and health system level were identified. Major barriers include lack of knowledge, lack of social support, and self-management support. Interventions identified in this review show that among inner-city African Americans with T2DM, the focus is placed at the health systems level, with very limited focus toward addressing individual- and community-level barriers. Final synthesis includes development of a new integrated model that explains barriers to care across multiple levels.

conclusionsThese findings highlight the fragmentation that may be occurring between policy, research, and practice for achieving health equity and addressing health disparities for T2DM care among inner-city African Americans. The new model is an important step in the pursuit of equity in T2DM by specifying the complex barriers that occur across multiple levels. The application of this model using the 2017 National Standards for Diabetes-Self Management Education and Support are discussed.

Indexed as

AdultBlack or African AmericanCitiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareSocial EnvironmentSocial SupportUnited StatesUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID31802703
PMCPMC7853305
OpenAlexW2992051571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.