Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31802651›Full record

ReviewStem cells translational medicine2020

Simple limbal epithelial transplantation: Current status and future perspectives.

Catherine J Jackson, Inger T Myklebust Ernø, Håkon Ringstad, Kim A Tønseth, Darlene A Dartt, Tor P Utheim

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. PAX6-WNK2 Axis Governs Corneal Epithelial Homeostasis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Corneal stromal repair and regeneration.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2022
    Review
  16. Corneal Epithelial Regeneration: Old and New Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Catherine J JacksonDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Institute for Surgical Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9683-2343
Inger T Myklebust ErnøInstitute of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Håkon RingstadInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.
Kim A TønsethDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Institute for Surgical Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Darlene A DarttSchepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Tor P UtheimDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Institute for Surgical Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3821-6777
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NOMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Damage to limbal stem cells as a result of injury or disease can lead to limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). This disease is characterized by decreased vision that is often painful and may progress to blindness. Clinical features include inflammation, neovascularization, and persistent cornea epithelial defects. Successful strategies for treatment involve transplantation of grafts harvested from the limbus of the alternate healthy eye, called conjunctival-limbal autograft (CLAU) and transplantation of limbal cell sheets cultured from limbal biopsies, termed cultured limbal epithelial transplantation (CLET). In 2012, Sangwan and colleagues presented simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET), a novel transplantation technique that combines the benefits of CLAU and CLET and avoids the challenges associated with both. In SLET a small biopsy from the limbus of the healthy eye is divided and distributed over human amniotic membrane, which is placed on the affected cornea. Outgrowth occurs from each small explant and a complete corneal epithelium is typically formed within 2 weeks. Advantages of SLET include reduced risk of iatrogenic LSCD occurring in the healthy cornea at harvest; direct transfer circumventing the need for cell culture; and the opportunity to perform biopsy harvest and transplantation in one operation. Success so far using SLET is comparable with CLAU and CLET. Of note, 336 of 404 (83%) operations using SLET resulted in restoration of the corneal epithelium, whereas visual acuity improved in 258 of the 373 (69%) reported cases. This review summarizes the results of 31 studies published on SLET since 2012. Progress, advantages, challenges, and suggestions for future studies are presented.

Indexed as

Corneal TransplantationFemaleHumansMaleStem Cellscornealimbal stem cell deficiencylimbussimple limbal epithelial transplantationstem cells

Identifiers

PMID31802651
PMCPMC7031634
OpenAlexW2991827177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.