ArticleThoracic cancer2020
Influence of tumor characteristics on correction differences between cone-beam computed tomography-guided patient setup strategies in stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the correction differences between vertebra and tumor matching as cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided setup strategies in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and the correlations with tumor characteristics such as size, mobility, and location.
methodsThe manual registrations for 33 lung tumors treated with SBRT were retrospectively performed by matching thoracic vertebrae for vertebra matching and then by matching CBCT-visualized tumors within the internal target volume obtained from a four-dimensional CT dataset for tumor matching.
resultsThe mean correction difference between the two matching methods during the SBRT fractions was larger in the anterior-posterior direction (2.7 mm) than in the superior-inferior (2.1 mm) and left-right (1.4 mm) directions, with differences of less than 5 mm in 90% of the total 134 CBCT fractions. The X-axis and direct distances from the central axis to the tumor had significant correlations with the correction differences in all three directions, while the mobility-related parameters were correlated only in the superior-inferior direction. The absolute differences in lung-dose parameters after applying the margins (3.4-6.5 mm) required for the setup errors from vertebra matching relative to tumor matching were mild, with values of 1.95 Gy for the mean lung dose and 3.9% for V20.
conclusionThe setup differences between vertebra and tumor matching in the CBCT-guided setup without rotation correction were increased in tumors located long distances from the central axis. The additional safety margins of 3.4-6.5 mm were required for the setup errors from vertebra matching. KEY POINTS: Significant findings of the study The correction difference between the vertebra and tumor matching as CBCT-guided setup strategies was the largest in the anterior-posterior direction and significantly correlated with the X-axis and direct distances from the central axis to the tumor. What this study adds Setup differences between vertebra and tumor matching in the CBCT-guided setup were increased in tumors located long distances from the central axis. The additional safety margins of 3.4-6.5 mm were required for the setup errors from vertebra matching.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.