Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31802436›Full record

ArticleNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2020

Benzodiazepines, z-Hypnotics, and Risk of Dementia: Special Considerations of Half-Lives and Concomitant Use.

Li-Yen Tseng, Shih-Tsung Huang, Li-Ning Peng, Liang-Kung Chen, Fei-Yuan Hsiao

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Which Severe Mental Illnesses Most Increase the Risk of Developing Dementia? Comparing the Risk of Dementia in Patients with Schizophrenia, Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Disorder.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Associations of Late-Life Sleep Medication Use With Incident Dementia in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Patients with Dementia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Li-Yen TsengDepartment of Geriatrics, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shih-Tsung HuangGraduate Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, 33, Linsen S. Rd, Taipei, 10050, Taiwan.
Li-Ning PengDepartment of Geriatrics, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Liang-Kung ChenDepartment of Geriatrics, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Fei-Yuan HsiaoGraduate Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, 33, Linsen S. Rd, Taipei, 10050, Taiwan. fyshsiao@ntu.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1660-9120
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWNational Taiwan University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The utilization of benzodiazepines (BZDs) and z-hypnotics has substantially increased with the aging of the population, but the risk of BZDs and z-hypnotics in the development of dementia remains a strong concern. This cohort study aimed to evaluate the risk of BZDs and z-hypnotics for subsequent dementia development with a special consideration of their half-lives and the concomitant use of these medications. People aged 65 years and older who were newly prescribed oral BZDs or z-hypnotics between 2003 and 2012 were identified from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. All BZDs were categorized as long-acting drugs (≥ 20 h) or short-acting drugs (< 20 h) for further comparisons, and data were collected on a quarterly basis, starting on the first date of drug prescription and ending on the date of death, occurrence of dementia, or end of the follow-up period (December 31, 2012), whichever came first. All dementia events except vascular dementia occurring during the follow-up period were identified. Among 260,502 eligible subjects, short-acting BZDs and z-hypnotics users were at greater risk of dementia than long-acting users [adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) in short-acting BZD users, 1.98 (1.89-2.07); z-hypnotic users, 1.79 (1.68-1.91); and long-acting BZD users, 1.47 (1.37-1.58)]. In addition, subjects concomitantly using 2 or more BZDs or z-hypnotics had a higher risk of dementia than those who used 1 of these drugs (4.79 (3.95-5.81)). The use of BZDs and z-hypnotics was strongly associated with the risk of dementia development, especially the short-acting BZDs, z-hypnotics, and concomitant use of multiple agents. These findings deserve further interventional studies for clarification.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBenzodiazepinesCohort StudiesDementiaFemaleHalf-LifeHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleRetrospective StudiesBenzodiazepinesHypnotics and SedativesBenzodiazepinesdementiaelderlyhalf-lifez-hypnotics

Identifiers

PMID31802436
PMCPMC7007460
OpenAlexW2992666566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.