ArticleInsights into imaging2019
The validity and applicability of CAD-RADS in the management of patients with coronary artery disease.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Large Language Models Versus Human Readers in CAD-RADS 2.0 Categorization of Coronary CT Angiography Reports.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Benchmarking 54 large language model configurations for CAD-RADS scoring: open-weight models approach human-level agreement.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Real-world insights into coronary CTA prognostication: value of semiquantitative scores.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- CAD-RADS 2.0: Comparison of methods for assessment of plaque burden.European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
- Validity of the 2019 European Society of Cardiology Pre-Test Probability (2019 ESC-PTP) for predicting obstructive coronary artery disease among Malaysians.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Reporting trends and clinical impact of high-risk coronary plaques on cardiac CT angiography in CAD-RADS.European radiology · 2026Article
- Leveraging GPT-4o for Automated Extraction and Categorization of CAD-RADS Features From Free-Text Coronary CT Angiography Reports: Diagnostic Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- The prognostic value of preoperative CAD-RADS classification in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve surgery.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Assessment of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived plaque features in the diagnosis of optical coherence tomography-defined vulnerable plaques.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Automated classification of coronary LEsions fRom coronary computed Tomography angiography scans with an updated deep learning model: ALERT study.European radiology · 2025Article
- High-resolution automated free-breathing coronary magnetic resonance angiography in comparison with coronary computed tomography angiography.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Moving towards a uniform diagnosis of coronary artery disease on coronary CTA : Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System 2.0.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2024Review
- Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: Developing A Gold Standard for Coronary Artery Disease Diagnostics.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Dataset for Automatic Region-based Coronary Artery Disease Diagnostics Using X-Ray Angiography Images.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Correlation between TyG index and coronary atherosclerosis assessed by CCTA in elderly male patients: a cross-sectional study.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2023Article
- Comparison of prognostic value between CAD-RADS 1.0 and CAD-RADS 2.0 evaluated by convolutional neural networks based CCTA.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Synergistic value of fractional flow reserve and low‑density non‑calcified plaque based on coronary computed tomography angiography for the identification of lesion‑specific ischemia.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022Article
- CAD-RADS™ 2.0 - 2022 Coronary Artery Disease - Reporting and Data System An Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North America Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI).Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2022Article
- Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Review
- Coronary artery disease imaging reporting and data system (CAD-RADS): what radiologists need to know?Emergency radiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe coronary artery disease reporting and data system (CAD-RADS) is designed for a uniform standardization of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) reporting and further management recommendations of coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aimed to assess clinical validity, applicability, and reproducibility of CAD-RADS in the management of patients with CAD. METHODS AND
resultsA single-center prospective study included 287 patients with clinically suspected or operated CAD who underwent CCTA. Four reviewers evaluated the CCTA images independently and assigned a CAD-RADS category to each patient. The invasive coronary angiography (ICA) was used as the reference standard for calculating diagnostic performance of CAD-RADS for categorizing the degree of coronary artery stenosis. The intra-class correlation (ICC) was used to test the inter-reviewer agreement (IRA). Reporting was provided to referring consultants according to the CAD-RADS. Based on ICA results, we have 156 patients with non-significant CAD and 131 patients with significant CAD. On a patient-based analysis, regarding those patients classified as CAD-RADS 4 and CAD-RADS 5 for predicting significant CAD, the CAD-RADS had a sensitivity, specificity, and an accuracy of 100%, 96.8 to 98.7%, and 98.3 to 99.3%, respectively, depending on the reviewer. There was an excellent IRA for CAD-RADS categories (ICC = 0.9862). The best cutoff value for predicting significant CAD was > CAD-RADS 3. Eighty-seven percentage of referring consultants considered CAD-RADS reporting system to be "quite helpful" or "completely helpful" for clinical decision-making in CAD.
conclusionCAD-RADS is valuable for improving CCTA structural reports and facilitating decision-making with high diagnostic accuracy and high reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.