Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31802250›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020

Real-world prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions involving oral antineoplastic agents: a population-based study.

Sung Hwan Kim, Yewon Suh, Young-Mi Ah, Kwanghee Jun, Ju-Yeun Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Association of inappropriate polypharmacy with emergency department visits in older patients receiving anti-neoplastic therapy: a population-based study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sung Hwan KimCollege of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Yewon SuhCollege of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Young-Mi AhCollege of Pharmacy, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk, 38541, Republic of Korea.
Kwanghee JunCollege of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Ju-Yeun LeeCollege of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea. jypharm@snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2261-7330
Seoul National University · KRYeungnam University · KR

Funding

Seoul National University Research Resettlement Fund for the new faculty
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to gain insight into the real-world prevalence of potentially significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) involving oral antineoplastic agents using nationwide data in Korea.

methodsThe data from the 2016 and 2017 Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service-National Patients Sample (HIRA-NPS) of South Korea were used. The drugs prescribed concomitantly with oral anticancer drugs were screened for the potential DDIs by using two international DDI databases: Lexicomp

resultsOverall 5657 cases of DDIs in 2925 patients (26.4%) and 1640 cases of category 1 DDIs in 997 patients (9.0%) were identified among 11,076 patients receiving oral anticancer drugs. The prevalence was highest among the targeted agents (63.2%) followed by traditional (21.2%) and endocrine agents (19.3%). The common potential clinical consequences were increased risk of corrected QT interval prolongation (36.7%), reduced efficacy of antineoplastic agents (30.4%), and increased toxicities of antineoplastic agents (8.0%). Polypharmacy and the duration of oral cancer treatment increased the likelihood of potential DDIs in addition to individual antineoplastic agents.

conclusionsThis study showed that potentially significant DDIs with oral antineoplastic agents were prevalent in real-world practice. Recognizing the high prevalence of DDIs among patients taking oral antineoplastic agents is a necessary step toward improving the clinical outcome.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCross-Sectional StudiesDrug InteractionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPolypharmacyPrevalenceRepublic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsDrug interactionOral antineoplastic agentsPolypharmacyQTc prolongation

Identifiers

PMID31802250
OpenAlexW2993657740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.