Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31802214›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2020

Robotic assistance in interventional radiology: dream or reality?

Vania Tacher, Thierry de Baere

Abstract readEditorial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vania TacherService d'imagerie médicale, CHU Henri Mondor, Créteil, France. vania.tacher@aphp.fr.
Thierry de BaereService de radiologie interventionnelle, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. Thierry.DEBAERE@gustaveroussy.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key points• Robotic assistance in medicine has been a revolution.• The use of robots has naturally extended to interventional radiology for percutaneous and endovascular interventions.• The guidance is mainly performed with a remote (computer or joystick) allowing the operator and his team not to be exposed to X-rays.

Indexed as

HumansMaleRadiology, InterventionalRobotic Surgical ProceduresVascular Surgical Procedures

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.