ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2020
Long-term outcomes of radiofrequency treatment for fecal incontinence: are the results maintainable?
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel Nonablative Radiofrequency Approach for the Treatment of Anal Incontinence: A Phase 1 Clinical Trial.Cureus · 2023Article
- Diagnosis and management of fecal incontinence in children and adolescents.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- Radiofrequency in the treatment of fecal incontinence should no longer be recommended.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTemperature-controlled radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery to the sphincter complex has been proposed as an option for those patients not susceptible to a major surgical procedure for fecal incontinence (FI). The aim of the study was to evaluate the long-term (15 years) functional outcomes obtained after RF procedure for FI.
methodsThis was a retrospective analysis of our prospectively collected database of patients that underwent RF procedure for FI. Primary outcomes measured were the Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence scale (CCF-FI), Fecal Incontinence-related Quality of Life Score (FIQLS), the 36-Item Short Form survey (SF-36), endoanal ultrasound, and anorectal manometry. Evaluations were compared at baseline and at 15 years of follow-up.
resultsTen patients were followed up 15 years after RF procedure. There was no significant improvement in the CCF-FI score (13.8 vs. 12.4, p = 0.24). No significant changes in the FIQLS were observed including lifestyle (2.39 vs. 2.13, p = 0.23), coping (1.91 vs. 1.92, p = 0.96), and embarrassment (1.66 vs. 1.86; p = 0.43). However, significant worsening was found in the depression category (2.47 vs. 1.60, p = 0.001). The SF-36 showed significant worsening in the mental (36.7 vs. 25.8, p < 0.001), physical (53.1 vs. 41.4, p = 0.01), and social functions (50.9 vs. 31.25, p = 0.001). Anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasound showed no significant changes. No complications were found in the long-term follow-up.
conclusionsRadiofrequency procedure for fecal incontinence did not maintain its efficacy during long-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31802189What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.