ReviewDer Anaesthesist2020
[Frailty as potential indicator of perioperative risk for older patients].
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- RERAS: does age define recovery? The role of patient characteristics and ERAS protocols in robotic colorectal surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Frailty in anesthesia.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2026Review
- [Special features of the perioperative course in patients with frailty syndrome].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2023Article
- [Covert perioperative stroke-cause of postoperative cognitive deficits? Comments on the NeuroVISION study].Der Anaesthesist · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysical, cognitive and social frailty is increasingly being recognized as a prognostic factor in the perioperative treatment of older patients; however, the concept of frailty has not been introduced into clinical routine in anesthesia.
objectivesDefinition of terms, presentation of tools for determining the degree of frailty and measures to improve the clinical outcome of patients at risk. Proposal of a pragmatic approach for the detection and treatment of high-risk patients in everyday clinical practice. MATERIAL AND
methodsEvaluation of current reviews and original publications. Discussion and modification of established frailty assessment tools in context of the needs in perioperative medicine.
resultsThe degree of frailty is associated with the postoperative outcome. Depending on the definition used, the term frailty refers to a degraded resilience in the physical, mental or social domain. Although there is still no universal definition of frailty, it is clear that frailty is directly correlated with survival and postoperative morbidity. Classical perioperative risk markers such as age or ASA classification do not reach such high predictive value. For the perioperative screening and evaluation of frail patients, an adapted version of the MAGIC assessment in combination with two signal questions is recommended. The extent of frailty in a patient can be improved by a sufficient diet, by physiotherapeutic exercises and by providing cognitive aids; however, scientific proof that preoperative improvement of the frailty status subsequently improves postoperative results is available for only a few specific clinical conditions.
conclusionIn contrast to commonly used perioperative risk classifications, frailty is a sensitive marker for the patient's biological age. Therefore, it appears more suitable for estimating the perioperative risk than chronological age or other conventional tools, such as the ASA classification and is therefore a prerequisite for patient centered treatment pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31802172What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.