Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31802106›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2020

Effects of Surface Tension and Yield Stress on Mucus Plug Rupture: A Numerical Study.

Yingying Hu, Francesco Romanò, James B Grotberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Human lungs fluid mechanics: an overview of current modelling techniques.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yingying HuSchool of Electrical and Power Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China.
Francesco RomanòDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2123 Carl A. Gerstacker Building, 2200 Bonisteel Boulevard, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2099; FRE 2017-LMFL-Laboratoire de Mécanique des Fluides de Lille-Kampé de Fériet, Centrale Lille, Arts et Metiers ParisTech, ONERA, CNRS, University Lille, Lille F-59000, France.
James B GrotbergDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2123 Carl A. Gerstacker Building, 2200 Bonisteel Boulevard, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2099.

Funding

Microfluidic Tissue Engineering of Small Airway InjuriesR01HL136141 · NHLBI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GROTBERG, JAMES BERNARD, NEMZEK, JEAN A · 2017 to 2020
$2.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL136141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We study the effects of surface tension and yield stress on mucus plug rupture. A three-dimensional simplified configuration is employed to simulate mucus plug rupture in a collapsed lung airway of the tenth generation. The Herschel-Bulkley model is used to take into account the non-Newtonian viscoplastic fluid properties of mucus. Results show that the maximum wall shear stress greatly changes right prior to the rupture of the mucus plug. The surface tension influences mainly the late stage of the rupture process when the plug deforms greatly and the curvature of the mucus-air interface becomes significant. High surface tension increases the wall shear stress and the time needed to rupture since it produces a resistance to the rupture, as well as strong stress and velocity gradients across the mucus-air interface. The yield stress effects are pronounced mainly at the beginning. High yield stress makes the plug take a long time to yield and slows down the whole rupture process. When the effects induced by the surface tension and yield forces are comparable, dynamical quantities strongly depend on the ratio of the two forces. The pressure difference (the only driving in the study) contributes to wall shear stress much more than yield stress and surface tension per unit length. Wall shear stress is less sensitive to the variation in yield stress than that in surface tension. In general, wall shear stress can be effectively reduced by the smaller pressure difference and surface tension.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalMucusStress, MechanicalSurface TensionBiomechanical PhenomenaLungPressureShear StrengthHerschel–Bulkley modelmucus plug rupturesurface tensionwall shear stressyield stress

Identifiers

PMID31802106
PMCPMC7104762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.