Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2019
The effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in emergency hip fracture surgery (PIXIE trial): phase II randomised clinical trial.
Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prevention of Myocardial Injury by Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Emergent or Urgent Non-cardiac Surgery: a Randomized Clinical Trial
The Safety and Efficacy of Remote Ischemic Conditioning for the Treatment of Diabetic Kidney Disease: a Single-center Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Study
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of the relative differences in adverse events used for sample size calculations in orthopaedic trauma trials.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Pooled it
- Role of remote ischaemic conditioning in fracture healing and orthopaedic surgery-a systematic review and narrative synthesis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Long-term major adverse cardiovascular events following myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery: meta-analysis.BJS open · 2023Pooled it
- Protective Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning against Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rats and Mice: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on mortality and morbidity after non-cardiac surgery: meta-analysis.BJS open · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- Ischemic Preconditioning Improves Microvascular Endothelial Function in Remote Vasculature by Enhanced Prostacyclin Production.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Trial
- Association of Peripheral Nerve Block with Postoperative Myocardial Injury in High-risk Cardiac Older Adults Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery: A Two-center Retrospective Cohort Study.Anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Advances in biomarkers for myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Remote ischaemic preconditioning in cemented hip arthroplasty (the PRINCIPAL study)-randomised controlled trial: study protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Ischemic Preconditioning Negatively Affects Thrombogenic Clotting Profile in Cerebral Small Vessel Occlusion Stroke Patients.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2025Article
- Article
- Efficacy of remote ischaemic preconditioning on outcomes following non-cardiac non-vascular surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2023Review
- Safety and Feasibility Assessment of Repetitive Vascular Occlusion Stimulus (RVOS) Application to Multi-Organ Failure Critically Ill Patients: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning in Intra-Abdominal Cancer Surgery (RIPCa): A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Remote ischemic preconditioning enhances aerobic performance by accelerating regional oxygenation and improving cardiac function during acute hypobaric hypoxia exposure.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Implementing stakeholder engagement to explore alternative models of consent: An example from the PREP-IT trials.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2021Article
- Endogenous neuroprotective mechanism of ATP2B1 in transcriptional regulation of ischemic preconditioning.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Delayed surgery versus nonoperative treatment for hip fractures in post-COVID-19 arena: a retrospective study of 145 patients.Acta orthopaedica · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate whether remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) prevents myocardial injury in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.
designPhase II, multicentre, randomised, observer blinded, clinical trial.
settingThree Danish university hospitals, 2015-17.
participants648 patients with cardiovascular risk factors undergoing hip fracture surgery. 286 patients were assigned to RIPC and 287 were assigned to standard practice (control group).
interventionThe RIPC procedure was initiated before surgery with a tourniquet applied to the upper arm and consisted of four cycles of forearm ischaemia for five minutes followed by reperfusion for five minutes.
main outcome measuresThe original primary outcome was myocardial injury within four days of surgery, defined as a peak plasma cardiac troponin I concentration of 45 ng/L or more caused by ischaemia. The revised primary outcome was myocardial injury within four days of surgery, defined as a peak plasma cardiac troponin I concentration of 45 ng/L or more or high sensitive troponin I greater than 24 ng/L (the primary outcome was changed owing to availability of testing). Secondary outcomes were peak plasma troponin I and total troponin I release during the first four days after surgery (cardiac and high sensitive troponin I), perioperative myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiovascular events, and all cause mortality within 30 days of surgery, length of postoperative stay, and length of stay in the intensive care unit. Several planned secondary outcomes will be reported elsewhere.
results573 of the 648 randomised patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (mean age 79 (SD 10) years; 399 (70%) women). The primary outcome occurred in 25 of 168 (15%) patients in the RIPC group and 45 of 158 (28%) in the control group (odds ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.25 to 0.76; P=0.003). The revised primary outcome occurred in 57 of 286 patients (20%) in the RIPC group and 90 of 287 (31%) in the control group (0.55, 0.37 to 0.80; P=0.002). Myocardial infarction occurred in 10 patients (3%) in the RIPC group and 21 patients (7%) in the control group (0.46, 0.21 to 0.99; P=0.04). Statistical power was insufficient to draw firm conclusions on differences between groups for the other clinical secondary outcomes (major adverse cardiovascular events, 30 day all cause mortality, length of postoperative stay, and length of stay in the intensive care unit).
conclusionsRIPC reduced the risk of myocardial injury and infarction after emergency hip fracture surgery. It cannot be concluded that RIPC overall prevents major adverse cardiovascular events after surgery. The findings support larger scale clinical trials to assess longer term clinical outcomes and mortality.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02344797.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.