Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31801635›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2019

Limited role of DWI with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping in breast lesions presenting as non-mass enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Daly Avendano, Maria Adele Marino, Doris Leithner, Sunitha Thakur, Blanca Bernard-Davila, Danny F Martinez, Thomas H Helbich, Elizabeth A Morris, Maxine S Jochelson, Pascal A T Baltzer and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Update on DWI for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Daly AvendanoDepartment of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Suite 705, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Maria Adele MarinoDepartment of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Suite 705, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Doris LeithnerDepartment of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Suite 705, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Sunitha ThakurDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Blanca Bernard-DavilaDepartment of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Suite 705, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Danny F MartinezDepartment of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Suite 705, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Thomas H HelbichDivision of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Elizabeth A MorrisDepartment of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Suite 705, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Maxine S JochelsonDepartment of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Suite 705, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Pascal A T BaltzerDivision of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Paola ClauserDivision of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Panagiotis KapetasDivision of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Katja PinkerDepartment of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Suite 705, 300 E 66th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA. pinkerk@mskcc.org.ORCID 0000-0002-2722-7331
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMedical University of Vienna · ATGoethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAvailable data proving the value of DWI for breast cancer diagnosis is mainly for enhancing masses; DWI may be less sensitive and specific in non-mass enhancement (NME) lesions. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of DWI using different ROI measurement approaches and ADC metrics in breast lesions presenting as NME lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.

methodsIn this retrospective study, 95 patients who underwent multiparametric MRI with DCE and DWI from September 2007 to July 2013 and who were diagnosed with a suspicious NME (BI-RADS 4/5) were included. Twenty-nine patients were excluded for lesion non-visibility on DWI (n = 24: 12 benign and 12 malignant) and poor DWI quality (n = 5: 1 benign and 4 malignant). Two readers independently assessed DWI and DCE-MRI findings in two separate randomized readings using different ADC metrics and ROI approaches. NME lesions were classified as either benign (> 1.3 × 10

resultsThere were 39 malignant (59%) and 27 benign (41%) lesions in 66 (65 women, 1 man) patients (mean age, 51.8 years). The mean ADC value of the darkest part of the tumor (Dptu) achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy, with AUCs of up to 0.71. Inter-reader agreement was highest with Dptu ADC max (CCC 0.42) and lowest with the point tumor (Ptu) ADC min (CCC = - 0.01). Intra-reader agreement was highest with Wtu ADC mean (CCC = 0.44 for reader 1, 0.41 for reader 2), but this was not associated with the highest diagnostic accuracy.

conclusionsDiagnostic accuracy of DWI with ADC mapping is limited in NME lesions. Thirty-one percent of lesions presenting as NME on DCE-MRI could not be evaluated with DWI, and therefore, DCE-MRI remains indispensable. Best results were achieved using Dptu 2D ROI measurement and ADC mean.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingImage EnhancementAdultAgedBreast DiseasesBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesContrast MediaBreast cancerDiffusion-weighted imagingMagnetic resonance imagingNon-mass enhancement

Identifiers

PMID31801635
PMCPMC6894318
OpenAlexW2992025766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.