Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31801605›Full record

Trial reportItalian journal of pediatrics2019

Effectiveness of message-framing intervention on complementary feeding related behaviors among mothers with infants aged 4-8 months: a 3-arm randomized controlled trial.

Ziba Rafieyan-Kopaei, Zohreh Fathian-Dastgerdi, Mohammad Javad Tarrahi, Fereshteh Zamani-Alavijeh

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ziba Rafieyan-KopaeiHealth Education and Health Promotion. Student Research Committee, School of Heath, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9171-5981
Zohreh Fathian-DastgerdiDepartment of Health Education and Promotion, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Hezar Jarib, Avenue, Postal Code, Isfahan, 81676-36954, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6763-9982
Mohammad Javad TarrahiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Heath, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7875-4572
Fereshteh Zamani-AlavijehDepartment of Health Education and Promotion, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Hezar Jarib, Avenue, Postal Code, Isfahan, 81676-36954, Iran. fe.zamani@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5683-9089

Funding

Isfahan University of Medical Sciences IR.MUI.REC.1396.3.770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveComplementary feeding from the age of 6 months along with breastfeeding is essential for the health of infants. The effect of educational interventions on preventing the early or late onset of complementary feeding and correcting other relevant behaviors depends on the framing of educational messages. This study aimed to compare different types of message framing on maternal behaviors in complementary feeding of infants. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis randomized controlled trial was performed on 96 mothers in three groups of 32 subjects with four-month-old infants in Isfahan (central Iran) during May-September 2018. Data were collected through self-report using a valid researcher-made questionnaire including demographic factors, knowledge, attitude, self-efficacy, and the complementary feeding related behaviors of mothers. For 4 months, the mothers received gain-framed messages in the GF group and loss-framed messages in the LF group from two different channels. The control group only received routine education. Data analysis was performed in SPSS20 using paired t-test, ANOVA, and Chi-square at the significance level of below 0.05.

resultsIn this study, all three groups were matched in terms of demographic characteristics and mean scores of attitude, knowledge, and self-efficacy regarding the complementary feeding of their infants. Following the intervention, the mean knowledge score increased in all three groups and was more favorable in the intervention groups compared to the control group. However, no difference was observed between the GF and LF groups regarding their knowledge. In addition, the GF and LF groups were similar in terms of self-efficacy and behavior of mothers concerning the appropriate onset of complementary feeding. Meanwhile, the mean scores of attitude and behavior of mothers regarding the timely onset, diversity, and appropriateness of continuing complementary feeding were higher in the LF group compared with the GF group.

conclusionFraming messages changes the attitude and knowledge and improves behaviors related to complementary feeding. The interesting point is the different impacts of different types of framing on psychological and behavioral variables. In general, loss-framed messages have more effects on the attitude and certain parts of maternal behaviors.

trial registrationIRCT, IRCT20180901040919N1. Registered 29 October 2018, https://en.irct.ir/trial/33782.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMother-Child RelationsAdultBreast FeedingChild DevelopmentFemaleHumansInfantIranMaleMothersReference ValuesRisk AssessmentComplementary feedingEducation of mothersMessage framing

Identifiers

PMID31801605
PMCPMC6894219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.