Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31801579›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2019

Who buys nets? Factors associated with ownership and use of purchased mosquito nets in sub-Saharan Africa.

Bolanle Olapeju, Ifta Choiriyyah, Kathryn Bertram, Danielle Piccinini, Hunter Harig, Richmond Ato Selby, Matthew Lynch, Hannah Koenker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bolanle OlapejuPMI VectorWorks Project, Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA. bolanle.olapeju@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2958-2708
Ifta ChoiriyyahDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Kathryn BertramPMI VectorWorks Project, Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Danielle PiccininiPMI VectorWorks Project, Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Hunter HarigPMI VectorWorks Project, Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Richmond Ato SelbyPMI VectorWorks Project, Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Matthew LynchPMI VectorWorks Project, Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Hannah KoenkerPMI VectorWorks Project, Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

United States Agency for International Development AID-OAA-A-14-00057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPublic sector strategies to promote insecticide-treated net (ITN) access have resulted in increased ITN ownership across sub-Saharan Africa. However, the current status of the private sector distribution channel for nets has not been fully explored. This multi-country study explored the prevalence of net purchases and the characteristics of households that had purchased nets and used such nets in sub-Saharan Africa.

methodsData from recent Malaria Indicator Survey (MIS) or Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) in 16 countries were analysed to explore the prevalence of purchased nets. Purchased nets were defined as nets obtained from shops/markets or pharmacies. Additional sub-analysis of factors associated with ownership and use of purchased nets was conducted in seven countries with over 10% of nets reported as purchased. Key outcomes included: prevalence of purchased nets out of all nets, household ownership of a purchased net, and whether a purchased net was used the previous night. Analytical methods included country level tests of association and multivariable logistic regressions.

resultsAmong all nets, the proportion of purchased nets in the study countries ranged from 0.8 to 32.7% and most (median = 77%) of these purchased nets were ITNs. Although the private nets are presumed to be from the retail, non-public sector, the prevalence of treated purchased nets suggests that some purchased nets may be "leaked" ITNs from public sector distributions, and thus, may be an informal sector rather than part of the formal "private sector". Urban, wealthier households as well as those with educated heads were more likely to own purchased nets. Use of such nets was, however, lower in wealthier households. In addition, net use was higher in households owning insufficient nets for their family size, and when the nets were newer than 24 months.

conclusionThe formal and informal private sector have played a role in bolstering net access rates in some settings. Study findings can help relevant malaria control stakeholders gain insight on the contribution of purchased nets on their overall ITN strategy, identify potential target populations for private sector nets as well as inform the design and distribution of private sector insecticide-treated nets that appeal to their target groups.

Indexed as

Africa South of the SaharaInsecticide-Treated BednetsMosquito ControlOwnershipSocioeconomic FactorsChannelDistributionInsecticide-treated netsPrivate-sectorPurchased netsSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID31801579
PMCPMC6894199
OpenAlexW2993198525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.