Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31801564›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2019

Shortcomings of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the axillary management of women with breast cancer.

Michel Attieh, Faek Jamali, Ghina Berjawi, Mothana Saadeldine, Fouad Boulos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michel AttiehDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El Solh 1107 2020, P.O. Box: 11-0236, Beirut, Lebanon.
Faek JamaliDepartment of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ghina BerjawiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Mothana SaadeldineDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El Solh 1107 2020, P.O. Box: 11-0236, Beirut, Lebanon.
Fouad BoulosDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El Solh 1107 2020, P.O. Box: 11-0236, Beirut, Lebanon. fb17@aub.edu.lb.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1921-081X
American University of Beirut Medical Center · LB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUltrasound, along with ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration, is currently used for the axillary evaluation of breast cancer patients in order to identify candidates for axillary lymph node dissection. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of this tool in correctly identifying patients who may or may not benefit from axillary clearance in light of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial recommendations.

methodsOne hundred one patients (65 with positive US-FNA with corresponding axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and 36 with negative US-FNA with corresponding ALND/sentinel lymph node biopsy) were studied for the number of involved axillary lymph nodes, tumor clinicopathologic features, and axillary radiologic findings.

resultsFrom the positive US-FNA group, 43% of patients had two or fewer positive lymph nodes upon ALND pathologic examination. In the US-FNA negative group, the negative predictive value for detecting axillary disease was 72.7%. With both groups combined, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of US-FNA for selecting patients based on axillary disease burden were 86%, 51.7%, 57%, and 83.3%, respectively.

conclusionBased on Z0011 guidelines, US-FNA is not a reliable tool in triaging patients in need for ALND and leads to overtreatment of 43% patients when positive, while depriving a small but significant percentage of patients from necessary therapy, when negative.

Indexed as

AxillaBiopsy, Fine-NeedleBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCarcinoma, LobularDisease ManagementFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImage-Guided BiopsyLymph NodesMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAxillary lymph node dissectionSentinel lymph node biopsyUltrasound-guided fine needle aspirationZ0011 trial

Identifiers

PMID31801564
PMCPMC6894218
OpenAlexW2991747358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.