ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2019
An attention-based deep learning model for clinical named entity recognition of Chinese electronic medical records.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Patient Consultations to Graphs: Leveraging LLMs for Patient Journey Knowledge Graph Construction.... IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2025Article
- Chinese Clinical Named Entity Recognition With Segmentation Synonym Sentence Synthesis Mechanism: Algorithm Development and Validation.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models in Chinese Medical Named Entity Recognition.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- MF-MNER: Multi-models Fusion for MNER in Chinese Clinical Electronic Medical Records.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2024Article
- Patient-centric knowledge graphs: a survey of current methods, challenges, and applications.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence-based prediction of cervical lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid cancer with CT.European radiology · 2023Article
- Named Entity Recognition in Electronic Health Records: A Methodological Review.Healthcare informatics research · 2023Article
- An Alternative Application of Natural Language Processing to Express a Characteristic Feature of Diseases in Japanese Medical Records.Methods of information in medicine · 2023Article
- What Is Machine Learning, Artificial Neural Networks and Deep Learning?-Examples of Practical Applications in Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A BERT-Span model for Chinese named entity recognition in rehabilitation medicine.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
- Integration of natural and deep artificial cognitive models in medical images: BERT-based NER and relation extraction for electronic medical records.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- A Multigranularity Text Driven Named Entity Recognition CGAN Model for Traditional Chinese Medicine Literatures.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Extraction of Traditional Chinese Medicine Entity: Design of a Novel Span-Level Named Entity Recognition Method With Distant Supervision.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- Extraction of Family History Information From Clinical Notes: Deep Learning and Heuristics Approach.JMIR medical informatics · 2020Article
- Limitations of Deep Learning Attention Mechanisms in Clinical Research: Empirical Case Study Based on the Korean Diabetic Disease Setting.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Editorial: The second international workshop on health natural language processing (HealthNLP 2019).BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical named entity recognition (CNER) is important for medical information mining and establishment of high-quality knowledge map. Due to the different text features from natural language and a large number of professional and uncommon clinical terms in Chinese electronic medical records (EMRs), there are still many difficulties in clinical named entity recognition of Chinese EMRs. It is of great importance to eliminate semantic interference and improve the ability of autonomous learning of internal features of the model under the small training corpus.
methodsFrom the perspective of deep learning, we integrated the attention mechanism into neural network, and proposed an improved clinical named entity recognition method for Chinese electronic medical records called BiLSTM-Att-CRF, which could capture more useful information of the context and avoid the problem of missing information caused by long-distance factors. In addition, medical dictionaries and part-of-speech (POS) features were also introduced to improve the performance of the model.
resultsBased on China Conference on Knowledge Graph and Semantic Computing (CCKS) 2017 and 2018 Chinese EMRs corpus, our BiLSTM-Att-CRF model finally achieved better performance than other widely-used models without additional features(F1-measure of 85.4% in CCKS 2018, F1-measure of 90.29% in CCKS 2017), and achieved the best performance with POS and dictionary features (F1-measure of 86.11% in CCKS 2018, F1-measure of 90.48% in CCKS 2017). In particular, the BiLSTM-Att-CRF model had significant effect on the improvement of Recall.
conclusionsOur work preliminarily confirmed the validity of attention mechanism in discovering key information and mining text features, which might provide useful ideas for future research in clinical named entity recognition of Chinese electronic medical records. In the future, we will explore the deeper application of attention mechanism in neural network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.