Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31801519›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2019

National recruitment scheme for pre-registration pharmacist training in England and Wales: a mixed method evaluation of experiences of applicant pharmacy students.

Laura McEwen-Smith, Malcolm James Price, Gail Fleming, Tim Swanwick, Christine Hirsch, Asma Yahyouche, Jonathan Ward, Sharon Buckley, Atif Shamim, Vibhu Paudyal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Laura McEwen-SmithSchool of Pharmacy, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Birmingham, UK.
Malcolm James PriceInstitute of Applied Health Research (Biostatistics), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Gail FlemingRoyal Pharmaceutical Society, London, UK.
Tim SwanwickNHS Health Education England, London, UK.
Christine HirschSchool of Pharmacy, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Birmingham, UK.
Asma YahyoucheSchool of Pharmacy, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Birmingham, UK.
Jonathan WardSchool of Pharmacy, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Birmingham, UK.
Sharon BuckleySchool of Pharmacy, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Birmingham, UK.
Atif ShamimSchool of Pharmacy, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Birmingham, UK.
Vibhu PaudyalSchool of Pharmacy, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Birmingham, UK. v.paudyal@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4173-6490

Funding

Health Education England N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA national pre-registration pharmacist training recruitment scheme, which replaces local recruitment models, was introduced in England and Wales in 2017. The national recruitment system allows pharmacy students to apply for the 52 weeks training programmes (mandatory requirement for registration as a pharmacist), through a single application system prior to undertaking a nationally administered assessment. This study aimed to explore experiences of pharmacy students on the national recruitment scheme, particularly their views on the selection methodology, application process, and offer outcomes.

methodsThis mixed method study involved a) an online survey of all (approximate n = 2800) year 4 (final year of MPharm degree) pharmacy students in England and Wales and b) a qualitative focus group with four students. The study population was eligible to participate in the 2017/18 national recruitment scheme. Survey respondents were invited to participate in a focus group. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential analysis. Qualitative data were analysed using the framework technique. Participation was voluntary. Ethical approval from University of Birmingham was obtained.

resultsA total of 307 completed surveys were returned (approximate response rate 11%). Respondents were generally satisfied with the application process and commended the fairness of the selection methodology and convenience in allowing them to apply to multiple training providers. Most survey respondents (n = 181, 72.9%) were either satisfied or highly satisfied with the training programme they were offered based on their assessment performances. Three themes and eight sub-themes obtained from the analysis of over 200 open comments data from the survey and transcript of a focus group with four participants. Results suggested the need to widen the timeframe available for applicants to shortlist their preferred employers, improve the method of programme listing in the application system, and consideration of prior achievements including academic performances and placement experiences to be included in the selection methodology.

conclusionsExperiences of pharmacy students on the national recruitment scheme suggest that respondents considered the selection methodology to be fair. Student engagement and satisfaction with the recruitment system can be maximised through improved listing of employers and widening the timescales for students to shortlist their preferred employers during application process. Inclusion of University achievements in the selection methodology will require consideration of evidence based approaches. Low response rate limits generalisation of findings.

Indexed as

Education, PharmacyPersonnel SelectionStudents, PharmacyEnglandFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesWalesEarly career trainingHealthcare trainingPharmacistsPre-registration training

Identifiers

PMID31801519
PMCPMC6894328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.