Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31801485›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2019

Multicenter phase III randomized trial comparing laparoscopy and laparotomy for colon cancer surgery in patients older than 75 years: the CELL study, a Fédération de Recherche en Chirurgie (FRENCH) trial.

Gilles Manceau, Antoine Brouquet, Pascal Chaibi, Guillaume Passot, Olivier Bouché, Murielle Mathonnet, Jean-Marc Regimbeau, Rea Lo Dico, Jérémie H Lefèvre, Frédérique Peschaud and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03033719 (Multicenter Randomized Trial Comparing Laparoscopy and Laparotomy for Colon Cancer Surgery in Patients Older Than 75 Years), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03033719 naunknown statusnot on this map

Multicenter Randomized Trial Comparing Laparoscopy and Laparotomy for Colon Cancer Surgery in Patients Older Than 75 Years

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2017 to 2020Enrolled276ConditionsColonic CancerArmsLaparotomy, Laparoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Gilles ManceauDepartment of Digestive and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France. gilles.manceau@yahoo.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0783-8688
Antoine BrouquetDepartment of Surgery, Paris-Sud University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Bicetre Hospital, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, France.
Pascal ChaibiUnité d'onco-hémato-gériatrie, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Charles Foix Hospital, Ivry-sur-Seine, France.
Guillaume PassotDepartment of Surgical Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Olivier BouchéDepartment of Digestive Oncology, Reims University Hospital, Reims, France.
Murielle MathonnetDepartment of Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges University, Limoges, France.
Jean-Marc RegimbeauDepartment of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Rea Lo DicoDepartment of Visceral and Oncologic Surgery, Paris Diderot University, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Jérémie H LefèvreDepartment of Surgery, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France.
Frédérique PeschaudDepartment of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Versailles St-Quentin-en-Yvelines/Paris Saclay University, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris Ambroise Paré Hospital, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Olivier FacyDepartment of Digestive Surgical Oncology, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Enrico VolpinDepartment of visceral and urological surgery, Simone Veil Hospital, Eaubonne, France.
Elie ChouillardDepartment of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Poissy Saint Germain Medical Center, Poissy, France.
Laura Beyert-BerjotDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Marc VernyDepartment of Geriatrics, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Mehdi KarouiDepartment of Digestive and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Stéphane BenoistDepartment of Surgery, Paris-Sud University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Bicetre Hospital, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, France.
Sorbonne Université · FRUniversité Paris-Sud · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRCHU Dijon Bourgogne · FRDélégation Paris 7 · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRUniversité de Limoges · FRUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral multicenter randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopy and conventional open surgery for colon cancer have demonstrated that laparoscopic approach achieved the same oncological results while improving significantly early postoperative outcomes. These trials included few elderly patients, with a median age not exceeding 71 years. However, colon cancer is a disease of the elderly. More than 65% of patients operated on for colon cancer belong to this age group, and this proportion may become more pronounced in the coming years. In current practice, laparoscopy is underused in this population.

methodsThe CELL (Colectomy for cancer in the Elderly by Laparoscopy or Laparotomy) trial is a multicenter, open-label randomized, 2-arm phase III superiority trial. Patients aged 75 years or older with uncomplicated colonic adenocarcinoma or endoscopically unresectable colonic polyp will be randomized to either colectomy by laparoscopy or laparotomy. The primary endpoint of the study is overall postoperative morbidity, defined as any complication classification occurring up to 30 days after surgery. The secondary endpoints are: 30-day and 90-day postoperative mortality, 30-day readmission rate, quality of surgical resection, health-related quality of life and evolution of geriatric assessment. A 35 to 20% overall postoperative morbidity rate reduction is expected for patients operated on by laparoscopy compared with those who underwent surgery by laparotomy. With a two-sided α risk of 5% and a power of 80% (β = 0.20), 276 patients will be required in total. DISCUSSION: To date, no dedicated randomized controlled trial has been conducted to evaluate morbidity after colon cancer surgery by laparoscopy or laparotomy in the elderly and the benefits of laparoscopy is still debated in this context. Thus, a prospective multicenter randomized trial evaluating postoperative outcomes specifically in elderly patients operated on for colon cancer by laparoscopy or laparotomy with curative intent is warranted. If significant, such a study might change the current surgical practices and allow a significant improvement in the surgical management of this population, which will be the vast majority of patients treated for colon cancer in the coming years.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03033719 (January 27, 2017).

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicColectomyColonic NeoplasmsEquivalence Trials as TopicGeriatric AssessmentHumansLaparoscopyLaparotomyPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicColon cancerElderly patientLaparoscopyLaparotomyMorbidityPhase III trialSurgery

Identifiers

PMID31801485
PMCPMC6894257
OpenAlexW2992497819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.