ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019
Validation of the Iranian version of the childbirth experience questionnaire 2.0.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementation and evaluation of the effectiveness of the continuous midwifery care model in socially vulnerable women: a convergent parallel mixed methods study protocol.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2026Trial
- Effect of midwifery students' continuity of care program on women's experiences of maternity care: A randomised controlled trial.PloS one · 2026Trial
- Effect of topical magnesium sulfate on labor duration and childbirth experience: a randomized controlled trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Trial
- Effect of implementation of the WHO intrapartum care model on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a randomized control trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Trial
- The effect of mindfulness-based counseling on the childbirth experience of primiparous women: a randomized controlled clinical trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Trial
- Effect of implementing a birth plan on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Trial
- Psychometric evaluation of the Birth Trauma Scale among Iranian women.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- Association between maternal and neonatal outcomes and psychosocial risk levels in pregnant women: a convergent parallel mixed methods study protocol.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Prevalence, related factors, and outcomes of fear of childbirth in pregnant women visiting health centers in Tabriz, Iran: a prospective study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Childbirth experience among different Iranian ethnic groups: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Article
- Psychometric properties of the revised version of the health and safety executive management standards indicator tool.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Association of remifentanil analgesia with postpartum depression and birth experience: an observational study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Observational
- The relationship between delivery fear and childbirth experience with the level of adherence to the WHO recommendations for a positive childbirth experience in Iranian women: a cross-sectional study.Reproductive health · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Measuring Women's Satisfaction with Childbirth: A Literature Review of Measurement Properties.Zdravstveno varstvo · 2024Review
- Association of childbirth experience with long-term psychological outcomes: a prospective cohort study.Reproductive health · 2024Article
- Psychometric properties of the experiences of maternity care scale among Iranian women.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Maternal performance after childbirth and its predictors: a cross sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAssessing women's childbirth experiences is a crucial indicator in maternity services because negative childbirth experiences are associated with maternal mortalities and morbidities. Due to the high caesarean birth rate in Iran, measuring childbirth experience is a top priority, however, there is no standard tool to measure this key indicator in Iran. The aim of present study is to adapt the "Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0" to the Iranian context and determine its psychometric characteristics.
methodsChildbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0 was translated into Farsi. A total of 500 primiparous women, at 4 to 16 weeks postpartum, were randomly selected from 54 healthcare centres in Tabriz. Internal consistency and reliability was calculated using the Cronbach's Coefficient alpha and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, respectively. Construct validity was assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and discriminant validity using the known-group method and the Mann-Whitney U-test.
resultsThe internal consistency and reliability for the total tool were high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93; Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 0.97). Explanatory factor analysis demonstrated the adequacy of the sampling (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin = 0.923) and significant factorable sphericity (p < 0.001). Confirmation factor analysis demonstrated acceptable values of fitness (RMSEA = 0.07, SRMSEA = 0.06, TLI = 0.97, CFI > 0.91, x
conclusionThe Farsi version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0 tool is a valid and reliable tool and can be used to measure the childbirth experience in Iranian women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.