Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31801402›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of international medical research2020

Advanced quantitative estimation methods for spasticity: a literature review.

Zichong Luo, Wai Leung Ambrose Lo, Ruihao Bian, Sengfat Wong, Le Li

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of international medical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05662878 (Evaluation of Hand Strength and Spasticity in Hemiplegic Patients Using Hand-Finger Robot Device), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05662878 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Hand Strength and Spasticity in Hemiplegic Patients Using Hand-Finger Robot Device

TypeobservationalSponsorAfyonkarahisar Health Sciences UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled161ConditionsNeurological Rehabilitation, Stroke, Upper Extremity ProblemArmsAssessment of Hand Strength and Spasticity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Scorpionism in Pará, Brazil: Clinical assessment of neuromuscular manifestations.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2025
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zichong LuoDepartment of Electromechanical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Macau, Macau, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4814-8990
Wai Leung Ambrose LoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7350-2157
Ruihao BianDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Sengfat WongDepartment of Electromechanical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Macau, Macau, China.
Le LiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-stroke spasticity seriously affects patients' quality of life. Spasticity is considered to involve both neural and non-neural factors. Current clinical scales, such as the Modified Ashworth Scale and the Modified Tardieu Scale, lack reliability and reproducibility. These scales are also unable to identify the neural and non-neural contributions to spasticity. Surface electromyography and biomechanical and myotonometry measurement methods for post-stroke spasticity are discussed in this report. Surface electromyography can provide neural information, while myotonometry can estimate muscular properties. Both the neural and non-neural contributions can be estimated by biomechanical measurement. These laboratory methods can quantitatively assess spasticity. They can provide more valuable information for further study on treatment and rehabilitation than clinical scales.

Indexed as

Muscle SpasticityQuality of LifeStrokeElectromyographyHumansReproducibility of ResultsbiomechanicalmyotonometryPost-stroke spasticityquantitative assessmentreviewsurface electromyogram

Identifiers

PMID31801402
PMCPMC7607521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.