Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31801185›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Anything You Can Do, I Can Do Better: Can Aptamers Replace Antibodies in Clinical Diagnostic Applications?

Michelle Bauer, Mia Strom, David S Hammond, Sarah Shigdar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Spiegelmer Aptamers: Innovative Approach in Breast Cancer.Breast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Nucleic acid therapeutics: Past, present, and future.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michelle BauerSchool of Medicine Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3128, Australia.
Mia StromSchool of Medicine Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3128, Australia.
David S HammondSchool of Medicine Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3128, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8093-1555
Sarah ShigdarSchool of Medicine Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3128, Australia.
Deakin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mainstay of clinical diagnostics is the use of specialised ligands that can recognise specific biomarkers relating to pathological changes. While protein antibodies have been utilised in these assays for the last 40 years, they have proven to be unreliable due to a number of reasons. The search for the 'perfect' targeting ligand or molecular probe has been slow, though the description of chemical antibodies, also known as aptamers, nearly 30 years ago suggested a replacement reagent. However, uptake has been slow to progress into the clinical environment. In this review, we discuss the issues associated with antibodies and describe some of the applications of aptamers that have relevancy to the clinical diagnostic environment.

Indexed as

AntibodiesAptamers, NucleotideMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesSELEX Aptamer TechniqueBiomarkersHumansImmunohistochemistryImmunophenotypingLigandsMolecular ProbesAntibodiesAptamers, NucleotideBiomarkersLigandsMolecular Probesantibodiesaptamersclinicaldiagnosticsimmunohistochemistryimmunophenotypinglateral flow devices

Identifiers

PMID31801185
PMCPMC6930532
OpenAlexW2989616205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.