Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31800627›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Assessment of the real-world safety profile of vedolizumab using the United States Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system.

Raymond K Cross, Michael Chiorean, Francis Vekeman, Yongling Xiao, Eric Wu, Jingdong Chao, Anthony W Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Residual Traditional Risk in Non-Traditional Atherosclerotic Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Raymond K CrossUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9766-5196
Michael ChioreanVirginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Francis VekemanGroupe d'analyse, Ltée, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Yongling XiaoGroupe d'analyse, Ltée, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Eric WuAnalysis Group, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jingdong ChaoAbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Anthony W WangAbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7551-4730
AbbVie (United States) · USAnalysis Group (United States) · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USVirginia Mason Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vedolizumab is the first gut-selective integrin blocker indicated for patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). This study aimed to examine the adverse events (AEs) profile of vedolizumab compared to anti-tumor necrosis factors (anti-TNFs) indicated for CD and UC using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. AE reports with vedolizumab (5/20/2014-6/30/2015) and CD/UC-indicated anti-TNF drugs (adalimumab, infliximab, certolizumab pegol, and golimumab, during 8/1/1998-6/30/2015) as primary suspects were extracted from the FAERS database. AEs associated with vedolizumab were compared for signals of disproportionate reporting against anti-TNF drugs and all other drugs (1969-6/30/2015), using the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) and the empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM) algorithms. The search retrieved 499 reports for vedolizumab and 119,620 reports for anti-TNFs, with 35.9% and 32.1% of these, respectively, being serious AEs. With the PRR approach, vedolizumab-associated reports had signals for 22 groups of AEs (9 were associated with serious outcomes) relative to anti-TNFs and had 34 signals relative to all other drugs. Signals detected included those reported as warnings in prescribing information and new AEs related to cardiovascular disease. Due to the voluntary nature of FAERS, this finding should be considered hypothesis generating (rather than hypothesis testing). Longer-term observational studies are required to evaluate the safety of vedolizumab.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedFemaleHumansMaleTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaUnited StatesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedTumor Necrosis Factor-alphavedolizumab

Identifiers

PMID31800627
PMCPMC6892509
OpenAlexW2992773260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.