Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31800618›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Transcranial magnetic stimulation induced early silent period and rebound activity re-examined.

Mustafa Görkem Özyurt, Heidi Haavik, Rasmus Wiberg Nedergaard, Betilay Topkara, Beatrice Selen Şenocak, Mehmet Berke Göztepe, Imran Khan Niazi, Kemal Sitki Türker

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07250464 (Investigation of Motor Evoked Potential and Cortical Silent Period in Migraine Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07250464 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Investigation of Motor Evoked Potential and Cortical Silent Period in Migraine Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul Gelisim UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsMigraine, Healty ControlsArmsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), Surface Electromyography (sEMG), Needle EMG / Single Motor Unit (SMU) Recording
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mustafa Görkem ÖzyurtSchool of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-2531-1174
Heidi HaavikCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland, New Zealand.
Rasmus Wiberg NedergaardCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland, New Zealand.
Betilay TopkaraSchool of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Beatrice Selen ŞenocakFrank H. Netter MD School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, North Haven, CT, United States of America.
Mehmet Berke GöztepeSchool of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1193-3696
Imran Khan NiaziCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8752-7224
Kemal Sitki TürkerSchool of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-9962-075X
Koç University · TRNew Zealand College of Chiropractic · NZAkdeniz University · TRQuinnipiac University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite being widely studied, the underlying mechanisms of transcranial magnetic brain stimulation (TMS) induced motor evoked potential (MEP), early cortical silent period (CSP) and rebound activity are not fully understood. Our aim is to better characterize these phenomena by combining various analysis tools on firing motor units. Responses of 29 tibialis anterior (TA) and 8 abductor pollicis brevis (APB) motor units to TMS pulses were studied using discharge rate and probability-based tools to illustrate the profile of the synaptic potentials as they develop on motoneurons in 24 healthy volunteers. According to probability-based methods, TMS pulse produces a short-latency MEP which is immediately followed by CSP that terminates at rebound activity. Discharge rate analysis, however, revealed not three, but just two events with distinct time courses; a long-lasting excitatory period (71.2 ± 9.0 ms for TA and 42.1 ± 11.2 ms for APB) and a long-latency inhibitory period with duration of 57.9 ± 9.5 ms for TA and 67.3 ± 13.8 ms for APB. We propose that part of the CSP may relate to the falling phase of net excitatory postsynaptic potential induced by TMS. Rebound activity, on the other hand, may represent tendon organ inhibition induced by MEP activated soleus contraction and/or long-latency intracortical inhibition. Due to generation of field potentials when high intensity TMS is used, this study is limited to investigate the events evoked by low intensity TMS only and does not provide information about later parts of much longer CSPs induced by high intensity TMS. Adding discharge rate analysis contributes to obtain a more accurate picture about the characteristics of TMS-induced events. These results have implications for interpreting motor responses following TMS for diagnosis and overseeing recovery from various neurological conditions.

Indexed as

Transcranial Magnetic StimulationAction PotentialsElectromyographyExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleMotor CortexMotor NeuronsMuscle, SkeletalSynaptic Potentials

Identifiers

PMID31800618
PMCPMC6892484
OpenAlexW2993352126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.