Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31799513›Full record

ArticleFunctional imaging and modeling of the heart : ... International Workshop, FIMH ..., proceedings. FIMH (Conference)2019

Correcting Undersampled Cardiac Sources in Equivalent Double Layer Forward Simulations.

Jess D Tate, Steffen Schuler, Olaf Dössel, Rob S MacLeod, Thom F Oostendorp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Functional imaging and modeling of the heart : ... International Workshop, FIMH ..., proceedings. FIMH (Conference), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The electrocardiographic forward problem: A benchmark study.Computers in biology and medicine · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A Unified Pipeline for ECG Imaging Testing.Computing in cardiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jess D TateScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2934-1453
Steffen SchulerInstitute of Biomed. Eng., KIT, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6515-3807
Olaf DösselInstitute of Biomed. Eng., KIT, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4551-7970
Rob S MacLeodScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0000-0356
Thom F OostendorpDonders Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2265-9327

Funding

TRD - VisualizationP41GM103545 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JURRUS, ELIZABETH · 2012 to 2019
$9.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrocardiographic Imaging (ECGI) requires robust ECG forward simulations to accurately calculate cardiac activity. However, many questions remain regarding ECG forward simulations, for instance: there are not common guidelines for the required cardiac source sampling. In this study we test equivalent double layer (EDL) forward simulations with differing cardiac source resolutions and different spatial interpolation techniques. The goal is to reduce error caused by undersampling of cardiac sources and provide guidelines to reduce said source undersampling in ECG forward simulations. Using a simulated dataset sampled at 5 spatial resolutions, we computed body surface potentials using an EDL forward simulation pipeline. We tested two spatial interpolation methods to reduce error due to undersampling triangle weighting and triangle splitting. This forward modeling pipeline showed high frequency artifacts in the predicted ECG time signals when the cardiac source resolution was too low. These low resolutions could also cause shifts in extrema location on the body surface maps. However, these errors in predicted potentials can be mitigated by using a spatial interpolation method. Using spatial interpolation can reduce the number of nodes required for accurate body surface potentials from 9,218 to 2,306. Spatial interpolation in this forward model could also help improve accuracy and reduce computational cost in subsequent ECGI applications.

Indexed as

Activation timesBody surface potentialsBoundary element methodECG forward simulationEquivalent double layerSpatial interpolation

Identifiers

PMID31799513
PMCPMC6889815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.