Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31799423›Full record

ReviewNPJ digital medicine2019

Integrating machine learning and multiscale modeling-perspectives, challenges, and opportunities in the biological, biomedical, and behavioral sciences.

Mark Alber, Adrian Buganza Tepole, William R Cannon, Suvranu De, Salvador Dura-Bernal, Krishna Garikipati, George Karniadakis, William W Lytton, Paris Perdikaris, Linda Petzold and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 199 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
199citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
33.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

199 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 605 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Accelerating amine-based COFundamental research · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

139 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Mark Alber1Department of Mathematics, University of California, Riverside, CA USA.
Adrian Buganza Tepole2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.
William R Cannon3Computational Biology Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3789-7889
Suvranu De4Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY USA.
Salvador Dura-Bernal5SUNY Downstate Medical Center and Kings County Hospital, Brooklyn, NY USA.
Krishna Garikipati6Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Mathematics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA.
George Karniadakis7Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI USA.
William W Lytton5SUNY Downstate Medical Center and Kings County Hospital, Brooklyn, NY USA.
Paris Perdikaris8Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA USA.
Linda Petzold9Department of Computer Science and Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA USA.
Ellen Kuhl10Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6283-935X
SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University · USBrown University · USPacific Northwest National Laboratory · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USRensselaer Polytechnic Institute · USStanford University · USUniversity of California, Riverside · USUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

StochSS: A Next-Generation Toolkit for Simulation-Driven Biological DiscoveryR01EB014877 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI PETZOLD, LINDA R. · 2012 to 2022
$3.9M
Multi-Scale Laws of Myocardial Growth and RemodelingU01HL119578 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GUCCIONE, JULIUS MATTEO, KASSAB, GHASSAN S · 2014 to 2018
$3.8M
Multiscale modeling and empirical study of a mechanism limiting blood clot growthU01HL116330 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI ALBER, MARK · 2014 to 2018
$3.5M
Multimodality imaging-driven multifidelity modeling of aortic dissectionU01HL142518 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HUMPHREY, JAY D., KARNIADAKIS, GEORGE · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
Multi-Scale Modeling to Predict Long-Term Growth and Remodeling of Skin in Response to StretchR01AR074525 · NIAMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI BUGANZA TEPOLE, ADRIAN · 2019 to 2023
$2.7M
Multiscale, Multiphysics Model of Thrombus Biomechanics in Aortic DissectionU01HL116323 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HUMPHREY, JAY D., KARNIADAKIS, GEORGE · 2013 to 2017
$2.4M
Microconnectomics of neocortex: a multiscale computer modelU01EB017695 · NIBIB · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI LYTTON, WILLIAM W · 2014 to 2017
$2.3M
Multiscale Modeling of Circadian RhythmsU01EB022546 · NIBIB · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI CANNON, WILLIAM R, DUNLAP, JAY C. · 2016 to 2019
$2.3M
Development and Validation of a Virtual Endoluminal Surgical Simulator (VESS) for Treatment of Colorectal CancerR01CA197491 · NCI · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI DE, SUVRANU · 2016 to 2019
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197491NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL116323NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL116330NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL119578NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL142518NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR074525NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB014877NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB017695NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB022546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fueled by breakthrough technology developments, the biological, biomedical, and behavioral sciences are now collecting more data than ever before. There is a critical need for time- and cost-efficient strategies to analyze and interpret these data to advance human health. The recent rise of machine learning as a powerful technique to integrate multimodality, multifidelity data, and reveal correlations between intertwined phenomena presents a special opportunity in this regard. However, machine learning alone ignores the fundamental laws of physics and can result in ill-posed problems or non-physical solutions. Multiscale modeling is a successful strategy to integrate multiscale, multiphysics data and uncover mechanisms that explain the emergence of function. However, multiscale modeling alone often fails to efficiently combine large datasets from different sources and different levels of resolution. Here we demonstrate that machine learning and multiscale modeling can naturally complement each other to create robust predictive models that integrate the underlying physics to manage ill-posed problems and explore massive design spaces. We review the current literature, highlight applications and opportunities, address open questions, and discuss potential challenges and limitations in four overarching topical areas: ordinary differential equations, partial differential equations, data-driven approaches, and theory-driven approaches. Towards these goals, we leverage expertise in applied mathematics, computer science, computational biology, biophysics, biomechanics, engineering mechanics, experimentation, and medicine. Our multidisciplinary perspective suggests that integrating machine learning and multiscale modeling can provide new insights into disease mechanisms, help identify new targets and treatment strategies, and inform decision making for the benefit of human health.

Indexed as

Computational biophysicsComputational science

Identifiers

PMID31799423
PMCPMC6877584
OpenAlexW2978281981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.