ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2019
Risk Factors for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Frequency With Which Patients Change Surgeons.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- What does a failure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction really mean? An integrative view.Knee surgery & related research · 2026Review
- Patient Age and Activity Level, Posterior Tibial Slope, and Use of Allograft Are Significant Risk Factors for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Failure: A Systematic Review.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025Review
- Survival Analysis of ACL Graft and Contralateral ACL Ruptures in Patients Younger Than 18 Years.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Age under 20 years, pre-operative participation in pivoting sports, and steep posterior tibial slope of more than 12° are risk factors for graft failure after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Influence of Surgeon Experience and Clinic Volume on Subjective Knee Function and Revision Rates in Primary ACL Reconstruction: A Study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Acute and subacute anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions are associated with a higher risk of revision and reoperation.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022Article
- Outcomes, Including Graft Tears, Contralateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears, and All-Cause Ipsilateral Knee Operations, are Similar for Adult-type, Transphyseal, and Partial Transphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autograft in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Controversies in ACL revision surgery: Italian expert group consensus and state of the art.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2022Review
- Practice Patterns for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in an Integrated Health Care System.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2022Article
- More anatomic tunnel placement for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by surgeons with high volume compared to low volume.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022Article
- Early Return to Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Is It Worth the Risk?Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2022Article
- Minimizing the risk of graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in athletes. A narrative review of the current evidence.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2022Review
- Optimal Graft Choice in Athletic Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Review and Clinical Insights.Open access journal of sports medicine · 2022Review
- Effect of Leg Dominance on Medium- to Long-Term Functional Outcomes, Quality of Life, and Revision Rates After Isolated ACL Reconstruction.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRevision surgery is a known complication after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR), but the proportion of patients who seek a different surgeon for their revision procedure is unknown. PURPOSE: To determine the rate and risk factors for revision ACLR in New Zealand and to find the proportion of patients undergoing revision ACLR who see a different surgeon compared with their primary procedure as well as the factors that may influence this decision. STUDY
designCase series; Level of evidence, 4.
methodsData from New Zealand's single government insurer, the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC), were analyzed. All primary ACLR procedures performed between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2014 were evaluated, and revision ACLR procedures performed between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2016, were evaluated to allow for a minimum 2-year follow-up period. Cases undergoing subsequent revision were divided into those with the same or a different surgeon compared with the primary procedure. Risk factors for revision and change of surgeons were assessed, including age, sex, time from injury to surgery, time between primary and revision procedures, surgeon volume, and ethnicity.
resultsA total of 15,212 primary ACLR procedures were recorded in 14,926 patients. The mean patient age was 29.2 years, and 61% were male patients. There were 676 subsequent revision procedures and 510 contralateral procedures during the study period, resulting in a 5-year survival rate of 95.5% for the ACL graft and 96.5% for the contralateral ACL. Risk factors for revision surgery included male sex, age <20 years, and <1 year from injury to surgery. Of the revision procedures, 44.5% (n = 301) were performed by a different surgeon compared with primary ACLR. For primary ACLR procedures performed by low-volume surgeons, 75.0% of patients requiring revision ACLR changed surgeons, compared with 21.5% for high-volume surgeons (≤10 vs >50 primary ACLR/y; hazard ratio, 10.70 [95% CI, 6.01-19.05];
conclusionA significant proportion of patients change surgeons when requiring revision ACLR. In the absence of formal follow-up systems such as registries, surgeons, particularly those with a low volume of ACLRs, may underestimate their personal revision rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.