Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31799284›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2019

Diagnosis of Drowning and the Value of the Diatom Test in Veterinary Forensic Pathology.

Giuseppe Piegari, Davide De Biase, Ilaria d'Aquino, Francesco Prisco, Rosario Fico, Raffaele Ilsami, Nicola Pozzato, Angelo Genovese, Orlando Paciello

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Characterization of Suspected Crimes against Companion Animals in Portugal.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe PiegariUnit of Pathology, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Davide De BiaseUnit of Pathology, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Ilaria d'AquinoUnit of Pathology, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Francesco PriscoUnit of Pathology, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Rosario FicoNational Center for the Forensic Veterinary Medicine, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e Toscana, Grosseto, Italy.
Raffaele IlsamiUnit of Pathology, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Nicola PozzatoVerona Diagnostic Laboratory, Istituto Zooprofilattivo Sperimentale delle Venezie, Legnaro, Italy.
Angelo GenoveseDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Orlando PacielloUnit of Pathology, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
University of Naples Federico II · ITIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e Toscana · ITIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of diatoms into the organs is considered an important "biological marker" for the diagnosis of drowning in human pathology, but it still has a high possibility for false positive results. The aims of this study were: (1) to evaluate the contribution of pathological examination in drowning cases and (2) to investigate the differences in the number and location of diatoms between animals who died in drowning and non-drowning conditions. For these purposes, 30 dead adult dogs were selected for the study and subdivided into five groups. The group A comprised six cadavers dead for drowning; the group B comprised six control animals; the groups C, D, and E comprised six animals dead for causes other than drowning and subsequently immersed in water for 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively. On each animal, a complete macroscopic and histological examination and diatom test were performed. Diatoms test and quantification were also performed on drowning mediums. Pathological findings of the animals in the group A showed pulmonary congestion, oedema, and hemorrages in the lung. However, similar injuries were also observed in control and experimentally submerged cadavers. In contrast, we observed a statistically differences between drowning animals and all experimentally submerged groups and control animals regarding diatom numbers recovered from organ tissue samples (

Indexed as

diatomsdiatoms testdrowningforensic medicineveterinary forensic pathology

Identifiers

PMID31799284
PMCPMC6868027
OpenAlexW2989253962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.