Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31799220›Full record

ArticleFrontline learning research2018

Neuroimaging of learning and development: improving ecological validity.

Nienke van Atteveldt, Marlieke T R van Kesteren, Barbara Braams, Lydia Krabbendam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontline learning research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Revisiting the role of computational neuroimaging in the era of integrative neuroscience.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  7. Remembering the future; prospective memory across the autistic adult's life span.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. From behavioral synchrony to language and beyond.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Opportunities and Limitations of Mobile Neuroimaging Technologies in Educational Neuroscience.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Towards Greater Collaboration in Educational Neuroscience: Perspectives From the 2018 Earli-SIG22 Conference.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society · 2020
    Article
  15. MEASURING BRAIN WAVES IN THE CLASSROOM.Frontiers for young minds · 2020
    Article
  16. Responsible Research and Innovation as a Novel Approach to Guide Educational Impact of Mind, Brain, and Education Research.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nienke van AtteveldtVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marlieke T R van KesterenVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Barbara BraamsVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lydia KrabbendamVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

European Research Council 716736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern neuroscience research, including neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), has provided valuable insights that advanced our understanding of brain development and learning processes significantly. However, there is a lively discussion about whether and how these insights can be meaningful to the educational practice. One of the main challenges is the low ecological validity of neuroimaging studies, making it hard to translate neuroimaging findings to real-life learning situations. Here, we describe four approaches that increase the ecological validity of neuroimaging experiments: using more naturalistic stimuli and tasks, moving the research to more naturalistic settings by using portable neuroimaging devices, combining tightly controlled lab-based neuroimaging measurements with real-life variables and follow-up field studies, and including stakeholders from the practice at all stages of the research. We illustrate these approaches with examples and explain how these directions of research optimize the benefits of neuroimaging techniques to study learning and development. This paper provides a frontline overview of methodological approaches that can be used for future neuroimaging studies to increase their ecological validity and thereby their relevance and applicability to the learning practice.

Indexed as

brain developmentecological validitylearningneuroimaging, educational neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID31799220
PMCPMC6887532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.