Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31799154›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of methodology2019

DNA extraction from archived hematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue slides for downstream molecular analysis.

Pushkal Sinduvadi Ramesh, Venkatesh Madegowda, Suprith Kumar, Shailashree Narasimha, Parichay S R, Nandini Nandish Manoli, Devananda Devegowda

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of methodology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Detection ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Haemoprotozoan surveillance in peri-urban native and introduced wildlife from Australia.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pushkal Sinduvadi RameshCenter of Excellence in Molecular Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru 570015, India.
Venkatesh MadegowdaCenter of Excellence in Molecular Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru 570015, India.
Suprith KumarCenter of Excellence in Molecular Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru 570015, India.
Shailashree NarasimhaCenter of Excellence in Molecular Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru 570015, India.
Parichay S RCIPHER Healthcare Pvt Ltd., Hyderabad 500034, India.
Nandini Nandish ManoliDepartment of Pathology, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru 570015, India.
Devananda DevegowdaCenter of Excellence in Molecular Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru 570015, India. devanandd@jssuni.edu.in.
JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research · INCipher Gene (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistopathologically stained archived tissue slides are stored in hospital archives for years to decades. They are the largest available source of biological materials and are a potentially useful resource that can be used for retrospective epidemiological studies. DNA recovered from the slides can be used for several downstream molecular processes including polymerase chain reaction, single nucleotide polymorphism analysis, and whole genome sequencing. The DNA from these slides can be utilized to compare gene signatures of normal and diseased tissues. However, extraction of high-quality DNA from archived stained hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides remains challenging.

aimTo standardize a new protocol for extracting DNA from archived H&E-stained tissue slides for further molecular assays.

methodsA total of 100 archived H&E-stained cancer slides were subjected to a total of five methods of DNA extraction. Methods were varied in the deparaffinization step, tissue rehydration, duration of lysis, and presence or absence of proteinase K. The extracted DNA was quantified using a NanoDrop spectrophometer and the quality was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Then each sample was subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify the internal control gene

resultsOf the five different methods tested, the third method wherein xylene was used for tissue deparaffinization followed by 72 h of digestion and without proteinase K inactivation yielded the highest amount of DNA with good purity. The yield was significantly higher when compared to other methods. In addition, 90% of the extracted DNA showed amplifiable

conclusionHere we present a step-by-step, cost-effective, and reproducible protocol for the extraction of PCR-friendly DNA from archived H&E-stained cancer tissue slides that can be used for further downstream molecular applications.

Indexed as

DeparaffinizationDNA extractionHematoxylin and eosin tissue slidesMolecular analysisPolymerase chain reaction

Identifiers

PMID31799154
PMCPMC6885493
OpenAlexW2984923201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.