Methods of extraction of optical properties from diffuse reflectance measurements of ex-vivo human colon tissue using thin film silicon photodetector arrays.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Investigation of water bonding status of normal and psoriatic skin in vivo using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy.Scientific reports · 2021
   Trial
2. Characterizing Muscle Components in Intestinal Strictures Using Spectroscopic Photoacoustic Imaging.Journal of biophotonics · 2026
   Article
3. Optical property recovery with spatially-resolved diffuse reflectance at short source-detector separations using a compact fiber-optic probe.Biomedical optics express · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

Abstract