ArticleBMJ global health2019
Addressing inequalities in medical workforce distribution: evidence from a quasi-experimental study in Brazil.
Article in BMJ global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transforming hemodialysis access in Kenya: a national assessment of the Managed Equipment Services model.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- What happens to population health when the doctors leave? Evidence from the exit of Cuban doctors in Brazil.Journal of health economics · 2026Article
- Spatial econometric analysis of health workforce distribution and its influencing factors in Inner Mongolia, China.PloS one · 2026Article
- Do generational diversity and perceived similarity improve team functioning in rural Chinese hospitals? A cross-sectional survey study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Are Doctors Equally Distributed Throughout the World?Iranian journal of public health · 2024Article
- Comparison Between Students Admitted Through Regular Path and Affirmative Action Systems in a Brazilian Public Medical School.Advances in medical education and practice · 2022Article
- Perceptions and Feelings of Brazilian Health Care Professionals Regarding the Effects of COVID-19: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Brazil's more doctors programme and infant health outcomes: a longitudinal analysis.Human resources for health · 2021Article
- Assessing the performance of beneficiary targeting in Brazil's More Doctors Programme.Health policy and planning · 2021Article
- Impact of Brazil's More Doctors Program on hospitalizations for primary care sensitive cardiovascular conditions.SSM - population health · 2020Article
- Impact of the Programa Mais médicos (more doctors Programme) on primary care doctor supply and amenable mortality: quasi-experimental study of 5565 Brazilian municipalities.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Shaping Tomorrow's Doctors: The Impact of Socioeconomic and Institutional Factors on Medical Education Quality in Brazil: An Ecological Study.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBrazil faces huge health inequality challenges since not all municipalities have access to primary care physicians. The More Doctors Programme (MDP), which started in 2013, was born out of this recognition, providing more than 18 000 doctors in the first few years. However, the programme faced a restructuring at the end of 2018.
methodsWe construct a panel municipality-level data between 2008 and 2017 for 5570 municipalities in Brazil. We employ a difference-in-differences empirical approach, combined with propensity score matching, to study the impacts of the programme on hospitalisations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions and its costs. We explore heterogeneous impacts by age of the patients, type of admissions, and municipalities that were given priority.
findingsThe MDP reduced ambulatory admissions by 2.9 per cent (p value <0.10) and the costs by 3.7 per cent (p value <0.01) over the mean. The reduction was driven by infectious gastroenteritis, bacterial pneumonias, asthma, kidney and urinary infections, and pelvic inflammatory disease. The results held on the subsample of municipalities targeted by the programme. By comparing the benefits of the programme from the reduction in the costs of ambulatory admissions to the total financial costs of the MDP, the impacts allowed the government to save at least BRL 27.88 (US$ 6.9 million) between 2014 and 2017.
conclusionAddressing inequalities in the distribution of the medical workforce remains a global challenge. Our results inform the discussion on the current strategy adopted in Brazil to increase access to primary healthcare in underserved areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.