Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31798986›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2019

Protecting the poor? Impact of the national health equity fund on utilization of government health services in Cambodia, 2006-2013.

Peter Leslie Annear, John Tayu Lee, Keovathanak Khim, Por Ir, Ellen Moscoe, Tapley Jordanwood, Thomas Bossert, Matthias Nachtnebel, Veasnakiry Lo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Flipped Break-Even: Re-Balancing Demand- and Supply-Side Financing of Health Centers in Cambodia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter Leslie AnnearNossal Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
John Tayu LeeSchool of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Keovathanak KhimPublic Health Department, University of Health Sciences, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.ORCID 0000-0002-8604-0323
Por IrNational Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Ellen MoscoeHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Tapley JordanwoodUniversity Research Co., LLC, Phnom, Cambodia.
Thomas BossertHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Matthias NachtnebelNossal Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Veasnakiry LoDepartment of Planning and Health Information, Ministry of Health, Cambodia, Cambodia.
The University of Melbourne · AUHarvard University · USMinistry of Health · KHNational Institute of Public Health · KHUniversity of Health Science · KH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCambodia's health equity fund (HEF) is the country's most significant social security scheme, covering the poorest one-fifth of the national population. During the last two decades, the HEF system was scaled up from an initial two health districts to national coverage of public health facilities. This is the first national study to examine the impact of the HEF on the utilisation of public health facilities.

methodsWe first investigated the level of national HEF population coverage and health service use made by HEF eligible members using an administrative HEF operational dataset. Second, through multilevel interrupted time series analysis of routine monthly utilisation statistics during 2006-2013, we evaluated the impact of the HEF on hospital and health centre utilisation.

resultsThe proportion of HEF beneficiaries using hospital services in a given year (4.6%) appeared to exceed rates in the general population (3.3%). The introduction of the HEF was associated with: a significant level change in the monthly number of consultations at HCs followed by a gradual slope increase in time trend and a significant level change in the monthly number of deliveries. Overall, this was equivalent to a 15.6% net increase in number of consultations and 5.3% in deliveries in the first year. At RHs: a significant level change in the number of RH inpatient cases, followed by a sustained slope increase; a significant slope increase in the number of outpatient consultations and in the overall number of newborn deliveries. Overall, this was equivalent to a 47.9% net increase in inpatient cases, 24.1% in outpatient cases and 31.4% in deliveries in the first year.

conclusionThe implementation of the HEF scheme was associated with increased utilisation of primary and secondary care services by the poor.

Indexed as

accessCAMbodiahealth equity fundsocial health insuranceutilization

Identifiers

PMID31798986
PMCPMC6861123
OpenAlexW2983829119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.